Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "fastenc".
Did you mean:
fasten
2001 Apr 05
2
Digital Ear evaluation of Vorbis beta 4
...a nasty
laserbeam-like artifact starting at about 7.5 seconds, in addition to a
noisy (fluttering) voice, for example at 3.5 seconds, and pre-echo in the
snaps. s27, though, is somewhat puzzling to me because I think it sounds ok.
Overall at 128 kbs, Vorbis definitely performed better than FhG FastEnc,
and probably performed better than Lame 3.88b using --nspsytune at the same
bitrates (except for the two samples above, which pulled down its rating).
From my own subjective listening tests, I'd agree that Vorbis beta 4
sounds better than the best mp3 codecs at 128 kbs for most music.
ff...
2001 Mar 20
1
tough file
...ar Wars I
soundtrack. Vorbis beta 4 at 128 produces artifacts that sound like some
tones are beating with others. I identified the Vorbis encode 16 of 16
times in an ABX test. I don't think it has anything to do with pre-echo:
it's just a mass of people in a chorus. Fraunhofer's FastEnc at 128 does
sound worse to me, if that's any consolation.
ff123
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubsc...