search for: fastdemagl

On June 22, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM, Pavel Labath (labath at google.com) wrote: I don't have any concrete feedback, but: - +1 for removing the "FastDemagler" - If you already construct an AST as a part of your demangling process, would it be possible to export that AST for external consumption somehow? Right now in lldb we sometimes need to parse the demangled name (to get the "basename" of a function for example), and the code for do...

...2017 at 15:21, Erik Pilkington <erik.pilkington at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On June 22, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM, Pavel Labath (labath at google.com) wrote: >> >> I don't have any concrete feedback, but: >> >> - +1 for removing the "FastDemagler" >> >> - If you already construct an AST as a part of your demangling >> process, would it be possible to export that AST for external >> consumption somehow? Right now in lldb we sometimes need to parse the >> demangled name (to get the "basename" of...

On 6/21/17 5:42 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > I'm very interested in your work because I've just started writing a > demangler for the Microsoft mangling scheme. What I found in the > current Itanium demangler is the same as you -- it looks like it > allocates too much memory during parsing and concatenates std::strings > too often. I could see there's a (probably big)