search for: fas6280

m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Matt Garman wrote: > >>We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only >>NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on >>these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off >>the NAS. > > <snip> > *IF* I understand you, I've got one question: what parms are you using to > mount the storage? We had *real* performance problems when we went f...

We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off the NAS. We recently upgraded all these machines from CentOS 5.7 to CentOS 6.5. We did a "piecemeal" upgrade, usually upgrading five or so machines at a time, every few days. We noticed improve...

...tos 5 > and 6? > Message-ID: > <CAJvUf-CyTg8ZiGq3OXRLKw7s1K2dGx1gqo_2XwOAXXQty=RHZQ at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only > NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on > these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off > the NAS. > > We recently upgraded all these machines from CentOS 5.7 to CentOS 6.5. > We did a "piecemeal" upgrade, usually upgrading five or so machines at > a time, every...

Matt Garman wrote: > We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only > NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on > these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off > the NAS. > > We recently upgraded all these machines from CentOS 5.7 to CentOS 6.5. > We did a "piecemeal" upgrade, usually upgrading five or so machines at > a time, every...

James Pearson wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Matt Garman wrote: >> >>>We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only >>>NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on >>>these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off >>>the NAS. >> >> <snip> >> *IF* I understand you, I've got one question: what parms are you using >> to mount the storage? We had *real* performance...

...essage-ID: > > <CAJvUf-CyTg8ZiGq3OXRLKw7s1K2dGx1gqo_2XwOAXXQty=RHZQ at mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > We have a "compute cluster" of about 100 machines that do a read-only > > NFS mount to a big NAS filer (a NetApp FAS6280). The jobs running on > > these boxes are analysis/simulation jobs that constantly read data off > > the NAS. > > > > We recently upgraded all these machines from CentOS 5.7 to CentOS 6.5. > > We did a "piecemeal" upgrade, usually upgrading five or so machi...

...in order to make an assessment on which format is right for our environment. This is a brand new build, with customer mailboxes to be migrated in over the course of 3-4 months. Some details on our new environment: * Approximately 1.6M+ mailboxes once all legacy systems are combined * NetApp FAS6280 storage w/ 120TB usable for mail storage, 1TB of FlashCache in each controller * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames) * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP * Dovecot servers have been split based on their role - Dovecot LDA Servers (running LMTP p...

If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I''m referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or home theater system. We''ve had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but I''m in the market for something new. The NetGear''s aren''t the cheapest ones around but they do what it says on the box. My only

If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I''m referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or home theater system. We''ve had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but I''m in the market for something new. The NetGear''s aren''t the cheapest ones around but they do what it says on the box. My only