search for: faq14

...he processor. It can be caused by an incorrect configuration of the virtual machine, a bug in the operating system, or a problem in the VMware Workstation software. Press OK to reboot virtual machine or Cancel to shut it down. The openbsd boot process is described here: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#Boot386 and there: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=boot&sektion=8&arch=i386&apropos=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current Does anyone there have an idea about booting one of thoses os from memdisk ? or an idea of the reason that make it so difficult ?

No change, just reposting without the "for discussion" tag. I think we should allow this as it seems like a nice coding style for a limited subset of imperative-style code. Rich.

When rewriting the heavily imperative original inspection code, I longed for a ‘return’ statement so I could keep the new code as close as possible to the original. OCaml of course does not have such a statement, but it's relatively simply to implement it in the language. The first patch does so, and the second patch rewrites a sample of the inspection code to use it. Rich.

Hi I''ve come accross a small problem with the rcf1918 address blocking on my internet interface. Im connected via a cable modem and it has an internel web server that allows me to configure/monitor it but as expected if I enable rfc1918 blocking for my eth0 interface(The internet one) it also blocks the cable modems web server. Is there any way it can add a rule before the rfc1918

Shorewall version 2.2.1 2 Interface setup. eth1: 10.10.1.3 eth0: 192.168.1.2 modem is 192.168.1.1 I need to be able to connect to my adsl modem, but when shorewall is up I get connection rejected. I have added "192.168.1.1 RETURN" above the line "192.168.0.0/16 logdrop # RFC 1918" in "/etc/shorewall/rfc1918" but still getting connection rejected Is there

...9;s fstab you can specify partitions on a disk by appending a + * period and a partition letter to a Disklable Unique Identifier. The + * DUID is a 16 hex digit field found in the OpenBSD's altered BSD + * disklabel. For more info see here: + * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#intro + */ + char device[10]; /* /dev/sd[0-9][a-z] */ + char part = spec[17]; + + /* We cannot peep into disklables, we can only assume that this is the + * first disk. + */ + snprintf(device, 10, "%s%c", "/dev/sd0", part); +...

...9;s fstab you can specify partitions on a disk by appending a + * period and a partition letter to a Disklable Unique Identifier. The + * DUID is a 16 hex digit field found in the OpenBSD's altered BSD + * disklabel. For more info see here: + * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#intro + */ + char device[10]; /* /dev/sd[0-9][a-z] */ + char part = spec[17]; + + /* We cannot peep into disklables, we can only assume that this is the + * first disk. + */ + snprintf(device, 10, "%s%c", "/dev/sd0", part); +...

...9;s fstab you can specify partitions on a disk by appending a + * period and a partition letter to a Disklable Unique Identifier. The + * DUID is a 16 hex digit field found in the OpenBSD's altered BSD + * disklabel. For more info see here: + * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#intro + */ + char device[10]; /* /dev/sd[0-9][a-z] */ + char part = spec[17]; + + /* We cannot peep into disklables, we can only assume that this is the + * first disk. + */ + snprintf(device, 10, "%s%c", "/dev/sd0", part); +...

Adds support for systemd .mount files, uses Augeas to extract mount points. Fixes RHBZ#1113153. Maros Zatko (1): inspection: add support for systemd .mount files src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 240 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 240 insertions(+) -- 1.9.3

...* on a disk by appending a period and a partition + * letter to a Disklable Unique Identifier. The + * DUID is a 16 hex digit field found in the + * OpenBSD's altered BSD disklabel. For more info + * see here: + * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#intro + *) + else if PCRE.matches re_openbsd_duid spec then ( + let part = spec.[17] in + (* We cannot peep into disklabels, we can only + * assume that this is the first disk. + *) + let device = sprintf "...

...* on a disk by appending a period and a partition + * letter to a Disklable Unique Identifier. The + * DUID is a 16 hex digit field found in the + * OpenBSD's altered BSD disklabel. For more info + * see here: + * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#intro + *) + else if Str.string_match re_openbsd_duid spec 0 then ( + let part = Str.matched_group 1 spec in + (* We cannot peep into disklabels, we can only + * assume that this is the first disk. + *) + let de...

...inor)) { fs->major_version = guestfs_int_parse_unsigned_int (g, major); free (major); if (fs->major_version == -1) { @@ -1337,14 +1337,14 @@ check_fstab (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) * disklabel. For more info see here: * http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#intro */ - char device[10]; /* /dev/sd[0-9][a-z] */ - char part = spec[17]; + char device[10]; /* /dev/sd[0-9][a-z] */ + char part = spec[17]; - /* We cannot peep into disklables, we can only assume that this is the - * first disk. - */ -...

This is the (incomplete) patch which reimplements inspection APIs in the daemon. All ‘XXX’s in this patch indicate areas which are not yet implemented or need further work. Rich.

Result of earlier copy and paste. --- align/scan.c | 35 ++++++++++--------- cat/cat.c | 39 +++++++++++---------- cat/filesystems.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- cat/log.c | 35 ++++++++++--------- cat/ls.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++---------------- df/main.c | 43 ++++++++++++------------ diff/diff.c | 67

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.