search for: fandino

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: password quality compliance Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:45:37 +0100 From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es> Reply-To: fandino@ng.fadesa.es To: samba@lists.samba.org Hello list, I'd like to have an advice about how to configure samba with password quality compliance. My file server is running samba 3.0.10 with a ldap backend and the users change their passwords regu...

Hi, The attached patch extends the mux listener to accept SOCKS requests in addition to the native mux commands. The rationale behind is that creating tunnels attached to TCP ports is a security hazard in multi-user machines where there is no way to control who connects through the tunnels. On the other hand, The mux UNIX domain socket binds to the file system and regular permissions can be

When a forwarding specification ending in a slash ('\\') is used, the function "parse_fwd_field" jumps over the '\0' char marking the end of the string and keeps processing. This patch checks for that condition. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Fix-buffer-overrun.patch Type: application/text Size: 850 bytes Desc:

Later versions of OpenSSH allow the user to forward connections also to/from Unix sockets. This patch allows to use Unix sockets as the target when forwarding the local stdio using the -W feature. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Allow-forwarding-of-stdio-to-streamlocal-end-points.patch Type: application/text Size: 5796 bytes Desc: not

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > TCP is the kernel's responsibility. I guess that these values get > copied into each TCB from the copy managed via proc at connection > start time, but never updated afterwards. > This had to happen but the question is why is it possible to increase a timeout but not to decrease it. --

Hi, at work we have hundreds of machines, and for various of reasons, their hostnames (with domain) do not reflect their physical location. This means that for host "a.bb.cc" i have to go through jump host "jump1.bb.cc", and for "c.bb.cc" i have to go through jump host "jump2.bb.cc". which jump host should be used can be deduced by IP, but it looks that

...mode Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: sfandino at yahoo.com Created an attachment (id=1613) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1613) patch for OpenSSH current The attached patch extends the mux listener to accept SOCKS4/5 requests in addition to the native mux commands. The rationale behind is that creating tunnels attac...

Cheers, - Salva $ diff -c mux.c~ mux.c *** mux.c~ 2008-06-14 01:01:54.000000000 +0200 --- mux.c 2008-12-04 12:24:45.000000000 +0100 *************** *** 148,153 **** --- 148,154 ---- error("ControlSocket %s already exists, " "disabling multiplexing", options.control_path); close(muxserver_sock); + umask(old_umask);