search for: familuar

Please bear with me as this is quite a complicated problem which has eluded me for days now... I recently upgraded a Samba 2.2 PDC to Samba 3.0 [3.0.20a as of now]. After upgrading, I had problems with two XP machines, among 16 of them. One of them didn't validate the domain users correctly. That was immediately taken care of by having said machine leave and re-join the domain. Nothing

I like the idea of a generic MachineCodeWriter, although I prefer the name 'ObjectFileWriter'... I think we need to take a hard look at which bits of the Writer/Emitter infrastructure are needed for what tasks (Object File Emittion, JIT, etc.) and make sure that our abstractions are flexible enough... As it stands at the moment, the Writer and Emitter classes could definately be merged

> Currently, the MachO and ELF Writers and MachineCodeEmitters are > hard-coded into LLVMTargetMachine and llc. I am also interested in working on this area and interested in writting a COFF file backend. > In other words, the 'object file generation' capabilities of the > Common Code Generator are not generic. I was looking at making a parallel class to MachineCodeEmitter,

...hats much more descriptive of the functionality. >I think we need to take a hard look at which bits of the >Writer/Emitter infrastructure are needed for what tasks (Object File >Emittion, JIT, etc.) and make sure that our abstractions are flexible >enough... I would suggest being very familuar with the current code the JIT, and MachineCodeEmitter, and X86 and other CodeEmitter code before jumping in :) > As it stands at the moment, the Writer and Emitter classes >could definately be merged (at least from the perspective of object >file generation). I would not do this, their...

...in through samba4-dc1 and not the windows DC. ? Looking at below again. (objectclass=primaryDomain))' base: 'cn=Primary Domains': No such object: dsdb_search at ../source4/dsdb/common/util.c:4691) and from /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.tdb: NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO This looks familuar..? i have to look this up.. ( tomorrow, office is closing here.. sorry ) ? > Do I need to manually enter information (ldap and kerberos) about the new DC in the DNS entries in the msdcs.empresa.com.br e empresa.com.br trees? No, these records should and need to be created by the server. ? So...

...gt; > > > Looking at below again. > > (objectclass=primaryDomain))' base: 'cn=Primary Domains': No such > object: dsdb_search at ../source4/dsdb/common/util.c:4691) and from > /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.tdb: NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO > > This looks familuar.. i have to look this up.. ( tomorrow, office is > closing here.. sorry ) > > Yes, it is familiar, but misleading ;-) > > You can ignore anything after: 'Join failed - cleaning up' > > The error occurred before this point. > > Rowland > > > > > --...

Hi, I have 2 DC in my network. DC master is a Samba 4 and the secondary is Windows Server 2008. I want to put another Samba 4 as DC to replace Windows Server, however the following errors are emerging: root at samba4-dc2:~# samba-tool domain join empresa.com.br DC -k yes -d 3 lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered GENSEC