search for: falways

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "falways".

Did you mean: always
2011 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg flag to Clang. Applies against mainline. (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc) ~Will On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Arushi Aggarwal <arushi987 at gmail.com> wrote: >...
2011 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote: > FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg > flag to Clang. > > Applies against mainline. > > (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably > doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc) > > ~Will > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Arushi Ag...
2011 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
...o manually lowering it in the frontend, same as the llvm-gcc patch sent earlier does. ~Will On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote: > >> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg >> flag to Clang. >> >> Applies against mainline. >> >> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably >> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc) >> >> ~Will >> >> On Thu,...
2011 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
...e as the llvm-gcc > patch sent earlier does. > > ~Will > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote: >> >>> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg >>> flag to Clang. >>> >>> Applies against mainline. >>> >>> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably >>> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc) >>> >>&...
2011 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
Have these changes made it to mainline? Is there a way to get a patch for the backend, which does the actual lowering? Thanks, Arushi On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:54 PM, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote: > Sergey, > Here's a patch on llvm-gcc which adds a flag "-fuse-llvm-va-arg". > (Note that this patch won't ever be part of llvm-gcc upstream. It will most
2011 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
Sergey, Here's a patch on llvm-gcc which adds a flag "-fuse-llvm-va-arg". (Note that this patch won't ever be part of llvm-gcc upstream. It will most likely be deprecated by later changes.) - pdox -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110220/f814866f/attachment.html>
2011 Aug 18
1
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
...sent earlier does. >> >> ~Will >> >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote: >>> >>>> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg >>>> flag to Clang. >>>> >>>> Applies against mainline. >>>> >>>> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably >>>> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc) &...