Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "falways".
Did you mean:
always
2011 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg
flag to Clang.
Applies against mainline.
(As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably
doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc)
~Will
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Arushi Aggarwal <arushi987 at gmail.com> wrote:
>...
2011 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote:
> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg
> flag to Clang.
>
> Applies against mainline.
>
> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably
> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc)
>
> ~Will
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Arushi Ag...
2011 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
...o manually lowering it in the frontend, same as the llvm-gcc
patch sent earlier does.
~Will
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote:
>
>> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg
>> flag to Clang.
>>
>> Applies against mainline.
>>
>> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably
>> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc)
>>
>> ~Will
>>
>> On Thu,...
2011 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
...e as the llvm-gcc
> patch sent earlier does.
>
> ~Will
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg
>>> flag to Clang.
>>>
>>> Applies against mainline.
>>>
>>> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably
>>> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc)
>>>
>>&...
2011 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
Have these changes made it to mainline? Is there a way to get a patch for the
backend, which does the actual lowering?
Thanks,
Arushi
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:54 PM, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote:
> Sergey,
> Here's a patch on llvm-gcc which adds a flag "-fuse-llvm-va-arg".
> (Note that this patch won't ever be part of llvm-gcc upstream. It will most
2011 Feb 20
2
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
Sergey,
Here's a patch on llvm-gcc which adds a flag "-fuse-llvm-va-arg".
(Note that this patch won't ever be part of llvm-gcc upstream. It will most
likely be deprecated by later changes.)
- pdox
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110220/f814866f/attachment.html>
2011 Aug 18
1
[LLVMdev] Is va_arg deprecated?
...sent earlier does.
>>
>> ~Will
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Will Dietz wrote:
>>>
>>>> FWIW, attached is a similar patch that adds a -falways-use-llvm-vaarg
>>>> flag to Clang.
>>>>
>>>> Applies against mainline.
>>>>
>>>> (As discussed, va_arg isn't really supported well so this probably
>>>> doesn't work well on anything other than simple code, YMMV, etc)
&...