search for: falls

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this change[1]

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this change[1]

Hi all, This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case. Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this change[1]

...[6] " 10001 01/09/1986 11 GREAT FALLS GAS CO -5.75000 14160" [7] " 10001 01/10/1986 11 GREAT FALLS GAS CO...

...drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c index 844971e..2a6150a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ mxm_dcb_sanitise_entry(struct nvkm_bios *bios, void *data, int idx, u16 pdcb) break; case 0x0e: /* eDP, falls through to DPint */ ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00010000; + /* fall through */ case 0x07: /* DP internal, wtf is this?? HP8670w */ ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00000004; /* use_power_scripts? */ type = DCB_CONNECTOR_eDP; -- 2.7.4

...u/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c index 2a6150ab5611..70e2c414bb7b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ mxm_dcb_sanitise_entry(struct nvkm_bios *bios, void *data, int idx, u16 pdcb) break; case 0x0e: /* eDP, falls through to DPint */ ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00010000; - /* fall through */ + fallthrough; case 0x07: /* DP internal, wtf is this?? HP8670w */ ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00000004; /* use_power_scripts? */ type = DCB_CONNECTOR_eDP;

Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. *INTRODUCTION* The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch labels when control flow is not directed

...drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c index 844971e..2a6150a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ mxm_dcb_sanitise_entry(struct nvkm_bios *bios, void *data, int idx, u16 pdcb) break; case 0x0e: /* eDP, falls through to DPint */ ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00010000; + /* fall through */ case 0x07: /* DP internal, wtf is this?? HP8670w */ ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00000004; /* use_power_scripts? */ type = DCB_CONNECTOR_eDP; -- 2.7.4

....70e2c414bb7b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c > @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ mxm_dcb_sanitise_entry(struct nvkm_bios *bios, void *data, int idx, u16 pdcb) > break; > case 0x0e: /* eDP, falls through to DPint */ > ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00010000; > - /* fall through */ > + fallthrough; > case 0x07: /* DP internal, wtf is this?? HP8670w */ > ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00000004; /* use_power_scripts? */ >...

....c > index 844971e..2a6150a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mxm/nv50.c > @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ mxm_dcb_sanitise_entry(struct nvkm_bios *bios, void *data, int idx, u16 pdcb) > break; > case 0x0e: /* eDP, falls through to DPint */ > ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00010000; > + /* fall through */ > case 0x07: /* DP internal, wtf is this?? HP8670w */ > ctx.outp[1] |= 0x00000004; /* use_power_scripts? */ > type = DCB_CONNECTOR_eDP; >

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 Notice that, in some cases, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>wrote: > Hey Alex, > > Sorry if this is a silly question... are you asking if anyone "wants the > functionality proposed" or "wants to write the code for the functionality > proposed"? > *-Wimplicit-fallthrough* diagnostic is already implemented, and the patch in this thread

I am trying to model data in which subjects are followed through time to determine if they fall, or do not fall. Some of the subjects fall once, some fall several times. Follow-up time varies from subject to subject. I know how to model time to the first fall (e.g. Cox Proportional Hazards, Kaplan-Meir analyses, etc.) but I am not sure how I can model the data if I include the data for those

Colleagues, I am analyzing data collected during oceanographic cruises. We have conducted many cruises over the last decade. On each cruise we visit ~50 stations. At each station (termed EventNum)we lower an instrument that measures depth, temperature, salinity and oxygen every few seconds as it is lowered through the water. Data from all EventNums on all cruises are stacked, generating a data

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at embeddedor.com> wrote: > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch > cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 > > Notice that, in some cases, the code comment is modified > in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.

I'm designing a set of plots intended for a general audience; here's the code for one of them, using the latest version of ggplot: plot.enr.all <- ggplot(data=df1, aes(x=HS_GRAD_YEAR, y=Percentage, group=Enrolled_by, color=Enrolled_by, shape=Enrolled_by, fill=Enrolled_by)) + geom_line() + geom_point(size=3.5) + scale_y_continuous(breaks=seq(0, 100, 10),

Hello all, I cannot seem to figure out this seemingly simple procedure. I want to sort a data frame by a specified character vector. So for : df.. <- data.frame(Season=rep(c("Summer","Fall","Winter","Spring"),4),Obs= runif(length(rep(c("Summer","Fall","Winter","Spring"),4)))) I want to sort the data frame

I am trying to make predictions with se's using a nlme (kew11.nlme below). I get an error indicating levels for a factor are not allowed. I have searched and read Rnews, MEMSS, MASS, R-Help, and other lists in Spanish where I found questions similar to mine but not solution. I do not really care about the method used. Any suggestions to obtain predictions with se's from an nlme

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> > <dropping llvm-commits> >> > >> > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander

Ping. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: