search for: falling

...cases that only contain a break/continue/return statement[2][3][4]. Now that the -Wimplicit-fallthrough option has been globally enabled[5], any compiler should really warn on missing either a fallthrough annotation or any of the other case-terminating statements (break/continue/return/ goto) when falling through to the next case statement. Making exceptions to this introduces variation in case handling which may continue to lead to bugs, misunderstandings, and a general lack of robustness. The point of enabling options like -Wimplicit-fallthrough is to prevent human error and aid developers in spot...

...cases that only contain a break/continue/return statement[2][3][4]. Now that the -Wimplicit-fallthrough option has been globally enabled[5], any compiler should really warn on missing either a fallthrough annotation or any of the other case-terminating statements (break/continue/return/ goto) when falling through to the next case statement. Making exceptions to this introduces variation in case handling which may continue to lead to bugs, misunderstandings, and a general lack of robustness. The point of enabling options like -Wimplicit-fallthrough is to prevent human error and aid developers in spot...

...cases that only contain a break/continue/return statement[2][3][4]. Now that the -Wimplicit-fallthrough option has been globally enabled[5], any compiler should really warn on missing either a fallthrough annotation or any of the other case-terminating statements (break/continue/return/ goto) when falling through to the next case statement. Making exceptions to this introduces variation in case handling which may continue to lead to bugs, misunderstandings, and a general lack of robustness. The point of enabling options like -Wimplicit-fallthrough is to prevent human error and aid developers in spot...

Dear Experienced R Practitioners, I have 4GB .txt data called "dataset.txt" and have attempted to use *ff, bigmemory, filehash and sqldf *packages to import it, but have had no success. The readLines output of this data is: readLines("dataset.txt",n=20) [1] " "

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch aims to suppress 29 missing-break-in-switch false positives. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456891 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324063 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1324063 ("Missing break in switch")

Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars at kernel.org> ---

Hi llvmdev, llvm-commits, There was a discussion on this topic a while ago, and now I've decided to make a formal proposal and post it here. I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. *INTRODUCTION* The switch construct of C/C++ languages allows fall-throughs between switch labels when control flow is not directed

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo at embeddedor.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/hdmi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/nv04.c | 2 ++

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 03:31, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars at kernel.org> wrote: > > Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary > fall-through markings when it is the case. I really like this! I was not a fan of explicitly marking those with comments. Thank you, taken in my

Hi, Friendly ping: Who can take this? Thanks -- Gustavo On 10/17/18 9:28 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch aims to suppress 29 missing-break-in-switch false positives. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456891 ("Missing break in switch") >

...9dd9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c @@ -3236,6 +3236,7 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_tiling_mode_table_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) dev_warn(adev->dev, "Unknown chip type (%d) in function gfx_v8_0_tiling_mode_table_init() falling through to CHIP_CARRIZO\n", adev->asic_type); + /* fall through */ case CHIP_CARRIZO: modearray[0] = (ARRAY_MODE(ARRAY_2D_TILED_THIN1) | diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c index da58040fdbdc..41e01a7f57a4 100644 --- a/drivers/...

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>wrote: > Hey Alex, > > Sorry if this is a silly question... are you asking if anyone "wants the > functionality proposed" or "wants to write the code for the functionality > proposed"? > *-Wimplicit-fallthrough* diagnostic is already implemented, and the patch in this thread

I am trying to model data in which subjects are followed through time to determine if they fall, or do not fall. Some of the subjects fall once, some fall several times. Follow-up time varies from subject to subject. I know how to model time to the first fall (e.g. Cox Proportional Hazards, Kaplan-Meir analyses, etc.) but I am not sure how I can model the data if I include the data for those

Colleagues, I am analyzing data collected during oceanographic cruises. We have conducted many cruises over the last decade. On each cruise we visit ~50 stations. At each station (termed EventNum)we lower an instrument that measures depth, temperature, salinity and oxygen every few seconds as it is lowered through the water. Data from all EventNums on all cruises are stacked, generating a data

....c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c > @@ -3236,6 +3236,7 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_tiling_mode_table_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > dev_warn(adev->dev, > "Unknown chip type (%d) in function gfx_v8_0_tiling_mode_table_init() falling through to CHIP_CARRIZO\n", > adev->asic_type); > + /* fall through */ > > case CHIP_CARRIZO: > modearray[0] = (ARRAY_MODE(ARRAY_2D_TILED_THIN1) | > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dpm.c b/drivers/gp...

I'm designing a set of plots intended for a general audience; here's the code for one of them, using the latest version of ggplot: plot.enr.all <- ggplot(data=df1, aes(x=HS_GRAD_YEAR, y=Percentage, group=Enrolled_by, color=Enrolled_by, shape=Enrolled_by, fill=Enrolled_by)) + geom_line() + geom_point(size=3.5) + scale_y_continuous(breaks=seq(0, 100, 10),

Hello all, I cannot seem to figure out this seemingly simple procedure. I want to sort a data frame by a specified character vector. So for : df.. <- data.frame(Season=rep(c("Summer","Fall","Winter","Spring"),4),Obs= runif(length(rep(c("Summer","Fall","Winter","Spring"),4)))) I want to sort the data frame

I am trying to make predictions with se's using a nlme (kew11.nlme below). I get an error indicating levels for a factor are not allowed. I have searched and read Rnews, MEMSS, MASS, R-Help, and other lists in Spanish where I found questions similar to mine but not solution. I do not really care about the method used. Any suggestions to obtain predictions with se's from an nlme

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> > <dropping llvm-commits> >> > >> > On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Alexander

Ping. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alexander Kornienko <alexfh at google.com>wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: