search for: faliures

Help! I have 10 nodes: Ocfs2 1.2.4 RHEL4 U4 (AMD64) Kernel 2.6.9-42.ELsmp While running fsck.ocfs2 I am getting a lot of these. o2fsck_mark_cluster_allocated: Internal logic faliure !! duplicate cluster <bunch of numbers> Then I get a deluge of "Bad magic number in inode while trying to verify the type of directory entry <filename>" Is fsck failing to

One of my disks in the zfs raidz2 pool developed some mechanical faliure and had to be replaced. It is possible that I may have swaped the sata cables during the exchange, but this has never been a problem before in my previous tests. What concerns me is the output from zpool status for the c2d0 disk. The exchanged disk is now c3d0 but is no longer a part of the pool?! This is build_75 on x86

...me_nsec: 0x33de5143 -- 870207811 Last Extblk: 0 Sub Alloc Slot: 4 Sub Alloc Bit: 544 Tree Depth: 0 Count: 243 Next Free Rec: 1 ## Offset Clusters Block# 0 0 1 20289216 fsck.ocfs2 gives internal logic failures (or faliures ;) amongst other things, which sounds pretty bad. Is it? [root@jic55124 ~]# fsck.ocfs2 -fn /dev/sdf1 Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdf1: label: oracle uuid: e4 18 cb 00 24 2f 4d f2 96 b4 6f 3b 0a e9 b2 e8 number of blocks: 243930952 bytes per block: 4...

...me_nsec: 0x33de5143 -- 870207811 Last Extblk: 0 Sub Alloc Slot: 4 Sub Alloc Bit: 544 Tree Depth: 0 Count: 243 Next Free Rec: 1 ## Offset Clusters Block# 0 0 1 20289216 fsck.ocfs2 gives internal logic failures (or faliures ;) amongst other things, which sounds pretty bad. Is it? [root@jic55124 ~]# fsck.ocfs2 -fn /dev/sdf1 Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdf1: label: oracle uuid: e4 18 cb 00 24 2f 4d f2 96 b4 6f 3b 0a e9 b2 e8 number of blocks: 243930952 bytes per block: 4...

Hello, I build FireFox-46.0.1 source with llvm to test interprocedural register allocation. The build was successful with out any runtime faliures, here are few stats: Measure W/O IPRA WITH IPRA ======= ======== ========= Total Build Time 76 mins 82.3 mins 8% increment Octane v2.0 JS Benchmark Score (higher is better) 18675.69 19665.16 5% improvement Kraken JS Benchmark time (lower is better) 1416.2 ms 1421.3 ms 0.35% regression JetStream J...

...> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:41 AM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I build FireFox-46.0.1 source with llvm to test interprocedural register > > allocation. > > The build was successful with out any runtime faliures, here are few > stats: > > This is very good, thanks for working on this. > > > > > Measure W/O IPRA WITH IPRA > > ======= ======== ========= > > Total Build Time 76 mins 82.3 mins 8% increment > > Octane v2.0 JS Benchmark Score (higher is better) 18675.69...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, simple question: how can I execute a "fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf"? All I get is - ---snip--- myhost:~ # fsck.ocfs2 /dev/sdf fsck.ocfs2 1.4.3 Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/sdf: Label: SAP01 UUID: 5969C8CABB854F8EA9C17B5B8DE48EC6 Number of blocks: 183500800 Block size: 4096 Number of

...and just update the docker image, and then use perfherder to compare the results. HTH Axel On 19/06/16 20:41, vivek pandya wrote: > Hello, > > I build FireFox-46.0.1 source with llvm to test interprocedural > register allocation. > The build was successful with out any runtime faliures, here are few > stats: > > Measure W/O IPRAWITH IPRA > ======================== > Total Build Time76 mins82.3 mins8% increment > Octane v2.0 JS Benchmark Score (higher is better)18675.69 19665.165% > improvement > Kraken JS Benchmark time (lower is better)1416.2 ms 1421.3...

Hi All, I seem to be having a problem with all my VSPs. When I am registering with them I don't seem to be passing my port number. This problem causes other users the inability to call my VoIP number with the VSP. My VSP showed me what they are seeing. I have changed my useragent to be: Linksys/SPA941-4.1.15 Linksys/SPA941-4.1.15 Contact sip:1234321234@aa.bb.cc.dd with no

Hi, After unsuccessfully trying to join a samba server to my Win2k domain, I turn to you guys for help. The samba server in question is called BRITERSEN, and is on 192.168.1.4, the Win2k domain controller is called SPOCK and is on 192.168.1.3, the domain in question is petenet.britersen.co.uk Getting a kerberos ticket seems to go ok: [root@britersen:~]# klist Credentials cache:

Hi Daniel, I am on Archlinux. Anyway, I adapted the scripts. 2 questions: 1 - It looks like we are not on the same version . I am on 7.5.0. Which version are you running ? 2 - Your conf shows that you let managed-schema but deleted schema.xml. What is the meaning of each ? Thank you On 2018-12-22 00:19, Daniel Miller wrote: > Joan, > > The reason for dropping squat, I'm

Hello, I would like to share few things I have learned over time in my attempt to integrate all my Linux clients to an existing corporate Windows 2000 Active Directory (AD). I am a Linux admin for a small division in a large company and do not posses any special rights as far as AD goes. I ONLY have privileges on my division part of the tree in AD. Goals: - Integrate all Linux client to

Joan, The reason for dropping squat, I'm assuming, is that Lucene and Solr potentially provide superior features & performance and as they are 3rd-party libraries & apps it reduces the maintenance responsibilities and let's the Dovecot team focus on mail server specific stuff - and let others focus on FTS.? There is a *huge* difference between a functional Solr setup &

Also : - Java is 10.0.2 - If i delete schema.xml but create only managed-schema, the solr refuses to start with a java error "schema.xml missing" On 2018-12-30 08:46, Joan Moreau wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I am on Archlinux. Anyway, I adapted the scripts. > > 2 questions: > > 1 - It looks like we are not on the same version . I am on 7.5.0. Which version

Dear Daniel. Thank you for your kind reply. Regarding NFS, no, there is nothing like this in my setup. Deleteing SOLR and recreating it, I did it so many times already. I started with *your* setup in the first place, as FTS_squat (which actually works very well and very straightforward, I have no clue why going for SOlr which is just a pain and not maintaining squat), and it leads to

Hello fellow xenophiles and happy new year! I''ve documented the install procedure for a prototype server here since I found no similar document Anywhere on the net. It''s a Sarge-based Domain0 on linux root raid from scratch, using LVM to store the data for the domU mail server and its mailstore. I humbly submit my notes in the hope that they are useful to some weary traveller.