search for: fairness

Dear R users, I have a reproducible data and try to create new variable "clo" is 1 if know variable is equal to "very well" or "fairly well" and getalong is 4 or 5 otherwise it is 0. rep_data<- read.table(header=TRUE, text=" id1 id2 know getalong 100000016_a1 100000016_a2 very well 4 100000035_a1 100000035_a2 fairly

Hello everyone,   I am a very new user of R and I have a query about the cuminc function in the package cmprsk. In particular I would like to verify that I am interpreting the output correctly when we have a stratification variable.   Hypothetical example:   group : fair hair, dark hair fstatus: 1=Relapse, 2=TRM, 0=censored strata: sex (M or F)   Our data would be split into:   Fair, male,

Hello everyone, I am a very new user of R and I have a query about the cuminc function in the package cmprsk. In particular I would like to verify that I am interpreting the output correctly when we have a stratification variable. Hypothetical example: group : fair hair, dark hair fstatus: 1=Relapse, 2=TRM, 0=censored strata: sex (M or F) Our data would be split into: Fair, male,

...> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 02:47:04PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> In virtualized environment there are mainly three problems >> related to spinlocks that affects performance. >> 1. LHP (lock holder preemption) >> 2. Lock Waiter Preemption (LWP) >> 3. Starvation/fairness >> >> Though Ticketlocks solve fairness problem it worsens LWP, LHP problems. Though >> pv-ticketlocks tried to address these problems we can further improve at the >> cost of relaxed fairness. The following patch tries to achieve that by grouping >> (batched) ticket...

...> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 02:47:04PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> In virtualized environment there are mainly three problems >> related to spinlocks that affects performance. >> 1. LHP (lock holder preemption) >> 2. Lock Waiter Preemption (LWP) >> 3. Starvation/fairness >> >> Though Ticketlocks solve fairness problem it worsens LWP, LHP problems. Though >> pv-ticketlocks tried to address these problems we can further improve at the >> cost of relaxed fairness. The following patch tries to achieve that by grouping >> (batched) ticket...

=== NYC Ruby Job Fair -- April 25th The NYC Ruby meetings lately have looked a lot like middle school dances. On one side of the room is people saying, "Gee, I wish I could work full-time doing Ruby or Ruby on Rails." On the other side of the room are companies saying, "Wow, those Ruby people sure look cute, I wish they would all come work for me." The music is playing, the

...IRC. You have this because LPAR/virt muck and lock holder preemption issues etc.. qspinlock is 1) a fair lock (like ticket locks) and 2) provides out-of-word spinning, reducing cacheline pressure. Esp. on multi-socket x86 we saw the out-of-word spinning being a big win over our ticket locks. And fairness, brought to us by the ticket locks a long time ago, eliminated starvation issues we had, where a spinner local to the holder would 'always' win from a spinner further away. So under heavy enough local contention, the spinners on 'remote' CPUs would 'never' get to own the loc...

...IRC. You have this because LPAR/virt muck and lock holder preemption issues etc.. qspinlock is 1) a fair lock (like ticket locks) and 2) provides out-of-word spinning, reducing cacheline pressure. Esp. on multi-socket x86 we saw the out-of-word spinning being a big win over our ticket locks. And fairness, brought to us by the ticket locks a long time ago, eliminated starvation issues we had, where a spinner local to the holder would 'always' win from a spinner further away. So under heavy enough local contention, the spinners on 'remote' CPUs would 'never' get to own the loc...

I sent in some suggestions regarding Theora yesterday and I got some questions from you guys so I'll answer them.?i said this:Theora should have a feature that disables print screen and video recording software from capturing Theora videos.?Alot of you asked me about the Fair Use law. My answer is this. i do know about fair use.?The?problem is, alot of people don't obey the fair use law as

...another running VCPU trying to take a lock (since it takes time for the > >VCPU to be rescheduled). > > Actually, I think the unfair version should be automatically > selected if running on a hypervisor. Per-hypervisor pvops can > choose to enable the fair one. > > Lock unfairness may be particularly evident on a virtualized guest > when the host is overcommitted, but problems with fair locks are > even worse. > > In fact, RHEL/CentOS 6 already uses unfair locks if > X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR is set. The patch was rejected upstream in > favor of pv ticketloc...

We have a directory full of installation and configuration scripts that are updated on a fairly regular basis. I would like to implement some sort of version control for these files. I have used SVN and CVS in the past, but I thought I'd ask if anyone can recommend a simple, easy-to-use tool that would be better than cvs or subversion for this fairly simple setup.

...another running VCPU trying to take a lock (since it takes time for the > >VCPU to be rescheduled). > > Actually, I think the unfair version should be automatically > selected if running on a hypervisor. Per-hypervisor pvops can > choose to enable the fair one. > > Lock unfairness may be particularly evident on a virtualized guest > when the host is overcommitted, but problems with fair locks are > even worse. > > In fact, RHEL/CentOS 6 already uses unfair locks if > X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR is set. The patch was rejected upstream in > favor of pv ticketloc...

Hi I'm fairly new to R and am trying to analyse some large spectral datasets using stepwise regression (fairly standard in this area). I have a field sampled dataset, of which a proportion has been held back for validation. I gather than step() needs to be fed a regression model and lm() can produce a multiple regression. I had thought something like: spectra.lm <-

Hi, I've had a small case with noise suppression and AGC. I have a fairly noisy environment here, and with the default parameters, noise suppression works fairly well while I talk. However, when I shut up, AGC starts slowly increasing the gain until it has amplified whatever noise is left to levels about equal to having no filtering at all. As soon as I talk, AGC backs down fairly quick

Hi, One of my customer needs per flow rate control, so I write one. The code I post here is not finished, but it seems to work as expected. The kernel patch is agains kernel 2.6.11, the iproute2 patch is against iproute2-2.6.11-050314. I write the code in a hurry to meet deadline. There are many other things to do ahead for me. The code is written in 2 days (including read other

Hello guys I have a subnet with 255 users, which need to share 1 single slow internet connection, so i would like to implement a kind of *fair queuing *on the UPLOAD between them, which means that they all share the connection equally.. The tools that i have available is: A linux box with IPROUTE2,HTB and TC.. I have looked at some examples, and my first idea was to make 255 entries in

On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: > Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual > CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block > any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been freed. > > One solution to this problem is to allow unfair lock in a > para-virtualized environment. In this case, a new lock acquirer

On 12/03/14 18:54, Waiman Long wrote: > Locking is always an issue in a virtualized environment as the virtual > CPU that is waiting on a lock may get scheduled out and hence block > any progress in lock acquisition even when the lock has been freed. > > One solution to this problem is to allow unfair lock in a > para-virtualized environment. In this case, a new lock acquirer

Bonjour tout le monde. En fait je voudrait savoir si il est possible d''enlever l''une des trois fonctions de la frame(maximize_box, minimise_box, close_box). On peut retirer les 3 en même temps, mais est-ce que l''on peut juste retirer l''une des trois? merci sebastien http://beusse.liveror.com _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing

Hello David! On 11/16/20 11:30 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > Generally, the bar for being in-tree is fairly low, the bar to being removed > from the experimental-back-ends list is much higher. An experimental back end > is not built by default and is not in any of the binary releases. > > Experimental back ends provide a probation period for the maintainer community.