search for: failiure

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 18:44:43 +0000 > From: Sarogahtyp <sarogahtyp at web.de> > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base > > I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to > have a CentOS 7 chrooted system inside. > Ive done that chroot environment as described in > http://www.jefftk.com/p/32-bit-chroot-on-centos > > Now my problem ist that yum is not working...

Richard <lists-centos at ...> writes: > > > ------------ Original Message ------------ > > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 18:44:43 +0000 > > From: Sarogahtyp <sarogahtyp at ...> > > To: centos at ... > > Subject: [CentOS] yum install failiure - CentOS-7 - Base > > > > I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to > > have a CentOS 7 chrooted system inside. > > Ive done that chroot environment as described in > > http://www.jefftk.com/p/32-bit-chroot-on-centos > > > > Now my...

I have a running CentOS 6.5 64-bit system running and i like to have a CentOS 7 chrooted system inside. Ive done that chroot environment as described in http://www.jefftk.com/p/32-bit-chroot-on-centos Now my problem ist that yum is not working as i suggested: bash-4.2# yum install sudo Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14]

Huh....2.6.16.4....i mean! :) In smb.conf, i removed obey pam restrictions and now it works... What does "obey pam restrictions" do ? Cheers, Phil. - Hash: SHA1 Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) escreveu: > Hello, > I have an existing windows 2003 network and now try to add a new linux > server with samba/kerberos support for unified logon authentication. > Normally, everything

Damn, 2.6.13.4 i REALLY mean! :) (i probably need a holliday!) Huh....2.6.16.4....i mean! :) In smb.conf, i removed obey pam restrictions and now it works... What does "obey pam restrictions" do ? Cheers, Phil. - Hash: SHA1 Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro) escreveu: > Hello, > I have an existing windows 2003 network and now try to add a new linux > server with samba/kerberos

Hello, I have an existing windows 2003 network and now try to add a new linux server with samba/kerberos support for unified logon authentication. Normally, everything is installed & this is the configuration: - Debian with 2.6.16.4 kernel - heimdal kerberos - samba log info: log.smbd: [2005/10/17 10:48:26, 0] smbd/server.c:main(798) smbd version 3.0.14a-Debian started.

Hi, first online backup works, but why some parts are missing? Online: root# samba-tool domain backup online --targetdir=/mnt/backup/online/ --server=DC -UAdministrator Backup created 2019-Jun-18 11:04:19 Using samba-tool version: Samba 4.10.2 Domain online backup, using DC 'DOMAIN' Backup for domain DOMAIN (NetBIOS), DOMAIN (DNS realm) Backup contains domain secrets: True missing

...n-critical request) 192.168.90.1 is a 7940 ip phone configured as a SIP dial peer on asterisk pbx i mght added that the call seems to take place ok but this message appears every time - was hoping to some 'heads-up' on the severity of this message as it does seem to indicate some sort of failiure / misconfiguration ?? Thanks GT

Hi guys, I am just started to do selenium test in rails. can u guys plz tell me how to write selenium test for the below code. for ex: i want to use click action in selenium test for the below code <a href="#" onClick="javascript:show_form(''short'');">Add a Short Media Buy</a> advance thx regards, Karthick. -- Posted via

...sr --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --with-esx=yes I have compiled qemu and installed too, and make a symbolic link to /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 but my question is even I launch a vm in qemu, $virsh list showed nothing, further more, 1) if I use virtual machine manager, it get connection failiure, due to socket to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock'; No such file of dirctory. 2). there is missing libvirt-bin under /etc/init.d/, after compile and installed libvirt 1.2.6 3). I tried to start libvirtd daemon, sudo /usr/sbin/libvirtd/start shows "/usr/sbin/libvirtd: unexpected,...

Ein eingebundener Text mit undefiniertem Zeichensatz wurde abgetrennt. Name: nicht verf?gbar URL: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060618/a60e3fff/attachment.pl

Hi again, I keep posting about my problem with HTB -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016611.html With a bit of search I recently found the exact same problem I have in the 2004 archives with some graphs that explain it far better than I did -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014519.html and http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014568.html

Hi, Irecently setup a Oracle 10g RAC test environment with two HP/Compaq DL380s and a shared disk array. The array is presented as a single 136GB disk. The systems are running RedHat AS 3.0 Update 4. OCFS 1.0.13-PROD1 build: 5e87201061935f464cf6541c56eb2827 Oracle 10g 10.1.0.3.0 I was able to get everything working, had a database created and running an instance on each system. The

Hi Everyone, Has anyone had any experience of using the Promise FastTrak SX4000 or SuperTrak SX6000 IDE RAID Controllers under Centos (if it matters I'm using version 4). I've seen it listed on linuxcompatible.org as working but would prefer to find out any first-hand experince before I buy. I'm looking to build a new mini server based on Mini-ITX and have found a great 1U case

I am having to abandon asterisk after having used it for 2.5 years due to this problem. Every couple of days (sometimes more often, sometimes less), the machine will lock up because the TDM board or the Dahdi driver goes south. /var/log/messages starts filling up with repeated messages: kernel: TDM PCI Master abort The card I have is: *CLI> dahdi show status Description

we started using an ocfs file system about 4 months ago as the shared archived redo destination for the 4-node rac instances (HP dl380, msa1000, RH AS 2.1) . last night we are seeing some weird behavior, and my guess is the inode directory in the file system is getting corrupted. I've always had a bad feeling about OCFS not being very robust at handling constant file creation and deletion