search for: factorygirl

Rails 3.2.8 Very strange , it works in dv mode console , but not in a unit test class User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :subdomain validates_uniqueness_of :email, :scope => :subdomain_id class UserTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase def initialize_user @booboo = FactoryGirl.create(:subdomain, name: "booboo") @coocoo = FactoryGirl.create(:subdomain, name: "coocoo") FactoryGirl.create(:user, subdomain_id: @booboo[:id], email: "user.doe-PV5Ro7/Mrj4@public.gmane.org", password: "UkZaHWcy", password_confirmation: "UkZa...

I''m following Michael Hartl''s Ruby on Rails 3 Tutorial but I''m using Rails 3.2.8 and FactoryGirl 4.2.0 and rspec 2.14.1 I''m in chapter 10 trying to generate tests for pagination (using will_paginate 3.2.5 which works fine in dev) I can get FactoryGirl to test just fine if I don''t use Sequence but I can''t seem to figure out the correct syntax to test pagination usi...

Hi, I am using Factory girl with rspec and capybara for testing my rails appliction. I have the below code FactoryGirl.define do factory :user do |f| f.email "sss1 at gmail.com" f.userkey "12ssd345q62" end end When I run the test it is failing as "Validation Failed: Userkey has already been taken, Email has already been taken". What could be the reason for this. I am new to R...

I am trying to perform a test unit, using FactoryGirl include ActionDispatch::TestProcess FactoryGirl.define do factory :article do ....... photo { fixture_file_upload ''/files/test.jpg'', ''image/jpg'' } end end IN mt test_helper.rb I defined the fixture_path def fixture_path File.dirname(__FILE__)...

I'm using Rspec and FactoryGirl to create specs for multimodel paperclip attachments. From searching other questions, it seems like a single image attachment is more common. Car.rb class Car < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :uploads, dependent: :destroy validates :uploads, presence: { message: 'You must upl...

...st>'' I was wondering if anyone can give me an ideas of how to deal with this. My test environment is using shoulda, faker, and factory_girl test/models/reservation_test.rb: setup do List.create(name: ''reservation_limit'', values: 20) @reservation = FactoryGirl.build(:reservation) end should "remove unavailable times if reservation limit for time slot is full" do 20.times{ FactoryGirl.create :reservation } assert_equal false, FactoryGirl.create(:reservation), "reservation was created after total reservation for time s...

...(required)>'' If my understanding is correct, be_persisted is testing if the newly created model instance is properly stored in DB. I understand that my way is rather opposite: building test methods after setting actual codes. But first I need to understand RSpec. I have also setup FactoryGirl FactoryGirl.define do factory :plan do sequence(:give_take) { |n| [ 0, 1 ][n%2] } sequence(:weight) { | n | n } sequence(:check_in) { |c| [ true, false ][c%2] } sequence(:flight_name_id) { |n| n } day_departure Date.new(2012, 12, 1) end end which does work. Question: Can...

...kable activerecord for association. i''ve installed remarkable and remarkable activerecrod both gem. i''ve added both gem in my Gemfile. i''ve added "remarkable_activerecord" as required in spec_helper.rb. describe Authentication do FactoryGirl.build(:authentication).should belong_to(:user) end it "has a valid factory" do FactoryGirl.create(:authentication).should validate_presence_of(:uid) end i got error: : undefined method `belong_to'' and undefined method `validate_pr...

...#39;' require ''capybara/rspec'' Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each {|f| require f} RSpec.configure do |config| config.use_transactional_fixtures = true config.infer_base_class_for_anonymous_controllers = false endend Spork.each_run do FactoryGirl.reloadend test.rb: Upficial::Application.configure do config.whiny_nils = true config.consider_all_requests_local = true config.action_controller.perform_caching = false config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :testend The test itself is very straightforward: require ''spec...

Hey, I got following very simple test case: require ''spec_helper'' describe Country do it "should create a new instance given valid attributes" do Factory(:country) end end Factory looks like: Factory.sequence :country_name do |n| "Country #{n}" end Factory.define :country do |c| c.name Factory.next(:country_name) c.nationality "Foo

Hi guys, I tried reading up the RSPEC Book (Dec 2010) and googled a bit but I could not find anything. I''m using Rspec2. Example: spec/factories/categories.rb ====================== FactoryGirl.define do factory :category_intakes, :class => ''category'' do name ''intakes and filters'' description ''airfilters and etc.'' created_by 1 updated_by 1 end factory :category_audio, :class => ''category...

Hi, I am trying to test factory girl associations basically I have a user model and status model , what is supposed to happen is a user has many statuses and a status belongs to a user. I have tried to model this in factory girl as you can see in the files. When I try to execute the test I get Failure/Error: visit("/users/#{user.id}/statuses/#{status.id}")

I am working on my first Rails BDD project with extensive tests since starting out with Rails a few years ago. Running RSpec or Cucumber is really slow. I''m using Rails 3 and RSpec 2. To run one model spec with only 5 tests takes almost 1 minute! When it finishes it says it took only 0.9 seconds to run the actual test. So obviously it is loading the environment that takes so long. I just

Im one of my unit tests, I got an error I cannot even start looking for the issue as few information are logged ... Using the test console , there is no error at all : > rails console test >> Loading test environment (Rails 3.2.9.rc3) > site1 = FactoryGirl.create(:cms_site, label: "booboo") >> BEGIN .. .. >> but running my tests > unit > ruby -Itest test/unit/user_test.rb -n "/should_save_user_with_required_fields/" >> STARTED >> Error: test_should_save_user_with_required_fields(UserTest) NoMet...

Hello all, I am trying to understand when I try to run a test in cucumber what I am missing that it is failing. I am using FactoryGirl to create my records and using cucumber to test my logic however I know that I am doing something wrong in my testing I just can't seem to figure out what. Here is what I have: Feature: Feature: All features related to staff info Scenario: notification for empty shirt size Given ther...

1) Right now this is just testing a successful response. However, since I've gone and created a Post via FactoryGirl... how can I test the @post.id equals one of the id's being returned by the get: index json? describe Api::V1::PostsController do context 'Post' do before(:each) do @post = FactoryGirl.create(:post) end context '#index' do it "should have...

Hope this should be simple: I have a User model and a Role model. Factories for each. When I create a User using FG, I want to assign a specific role. Cant seem to figure out how to do this, getting errors like: uninitialized constant SysadminRole for doing things this way: Factory.define :user do |u| u.practice_id { |a| a.association(:practice).id } u.password ''password1''

...Slow factory notices which are populated byfactory_girl. These Slow factory things heavy slow down the feature specs, I think, even feature specs are intrinsic slow specs. Then I had some inspect and found out most of the Slow factory was caused bypaperclip. We had model using paperclip here: FactoryGirl.define do factory :asset do image Rails.root.join(''spec/fixtures/sample.jpg'').open endend So I wonder if there''s a way like test mode for paperclip to speed up tests. I have simple solution here: Just copy the original file instead of actually crop it. The sta...

...eleases. I''m using fixtures currently but maintaining the foreign key relationships is getting more difficult as the app grows larger. I''d like something that''s aware of my foreign keys constraints and knows to load the data in the proper order. I''ve looked at FactoryGirl and seed_fu so far but would love to hear of any alternatives. Thanks, -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/

...bug. I need to simulate the concurrent requests that can result in the original bug. I thought of many ideas and decided to go with forking 2 or more processes (from within the test code) in which I issue a get request to my controller-action. Setup: MySQL DB, Rails 2.3.5, Ruby 1.9.1, Shoulda and FactoryGirl. Unfortunately this test code doesn''t do the trick. When I try to remove_connection before forking and then establish_connection inside the children processes, I don''t find data when asserting. When trying to use the same connection among the parent process and its children, I...