Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "facb8c73".
Did you mean:
facb6973
2005 Mar 16
1
Speex for TI 5509 DSP
Jamey,
There is a previous posting in the speex archives with a link to the dsp c5x
patch.
Archive link:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2004-October/002847.html
Patch link:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee
x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin
But that patch is very different (much smaller) then the dsp c5x patch at
http://handhelds.org/~jamey/speex/speex-1.1.6-jeh2.patch.
I had appied the patch at this link:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee
x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.b...
2005 Mar 02
7
Speex for TI 5509 DSP
I saw a thread in the list archives about a speex port to TI 55x DSP.
Wondering how that worked out (is working out)?
Also wondering if there is a source archive for it,
or if the patch in the email archives is still current, or if there's been
updates.
Any info appreciated.
Thanks
Paul
2004 Oct 29
2
speex on TI C5x fixed-point DSP
...to work with 8 or 16bit characters.
Patch is attached.
Jamey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: speex-1.1.6-jeh1.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 37358 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/speex-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin
2004 Sep 16
3
speex on TI C5x fixed-point DSP
Greetings,
I've just started porting speex to a TI C5509 DSP. It doesn't look like
it's going to be too painful, but there are a couple of quirks about the
C5x.
1) chars are 16 bits because memory addresses are for 16bit words
2) ints and short are also 16 bits (so sizeof(char) = sizeof(short) =
sizeof(int) = 1)
3) the c5x is essentially big endian
My plan is to change int and