search for: fa1

...way how to solve a problem related to loops for that I always get confused with. I would like to perform the following procedure in a compact way. Consider that p is a matrix composed of 100 rows and three columns. I need to calculate the sum over some rows of each column separately, as follows: fa1<-(colSums(p[1:25,])) fa2<-(colSums(p[26:50,])) fa3<-(colSums(p[51:75,])) fa4<-(colSums(p[76:100,])) fa5<-(colSums(p[1:100,])) and then I need to apply to each of them the following: fa1b<-c() for (i in 1:3){ fa1b[i]<-(100-(100*abs(fa1[i]/sum(fa1[i])-(1/3)))) } fa...

...os solaris2.9 system sparc, solaris2.9 status major 1 minor 9.0 year 2004 month 04 day 12 language R > testdata effect fa1 fa2 fa3 1 0.5054526 -1.4 1 -15.42 2 0.1366526 -2.5 3 -14.72 3 0.4798526 -1.1 3 -16.43 4 0.5566526 -4.6 2 -17.62 5 0.6568526 -3.5 7 -5.41 6 0.6653526 0.0 5 -11.88 7 0.6376526 0.0 5 -11.72 8 0.5203526 -2.9 -1 -14.72 9 0.4905526 -2.1 2 -17.68 10 0.6376526 -1.1 1 -13.3...

.....) (via JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...)) would encounter Fb in module B, run getLazyFunctionStub(...) on it, and then finish with the evaluation of the pending list; again via runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(). The latter functionality would result in the compilation of Fb. Say however we instead had Fa1 call Fb, and Fa2 in sequence (Fa1, Fa2 in module A, Fa2 not previously compiled). The former description would still hold up to the point Fa2 is encountered. Since Fa2 is in Fa1's module, runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...) would compile it, check the pending list, and update the contained function...

...pointer... and DB_Line will go to a func that lets me read the current variables off that stack pointer, and then send them via a socket/TCP-connection... to my debugger. However... I've fooled around with __builtin_frame_address and... I can't figure out how to properly use it. int* FA1 = (int*)__builtin_frame_address(1); int P0_ = FA1[0]; int P1_ = FA1[1]; int P2_ = FA1[2]; int P3_ = FA1[3]; Something like this... but NONE of these int variables contain the actual pointers stored in the calling function! I'm looking for the value "Type2* Value = 0x25b1...

...IT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...)) would encounter Fb in module B, run getLazyFunctionStub(...) on it, and > then finish with the evaluation of the pending list; again via runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(). The latter functionality > would result in the compilation of Fb. Say however we instead had Fa1 call Fb, and Fa2 in sequence (Fa1, Fa2 > in module A, Fa2 not previously compiled). The former description would still hold up to the point Fa2 is encountered. > Since Fa2 is in Fa1's module, runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(...) would compile it, check the pending list, and update the > con...

...about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission: [fa] comment = Share folder FA path = /home/fa public = no valid users = @fa, aa, bb #@fa= fa1, fa2 write list = @fa, aa, bb force create mode = 0777 create mask = 0777 directory mask = 3777 force directory mode = 3777 User...

...about share samba on CentOS 6.5 My case: data (excel file, linked file) of shared folder need security and not allow deleting except for owner and owning group, My testing configuration: + NTFS permision: chmod 3775 on shared folder, # chmod 3777 fa # ll total 8 drwxrwsrwt 2 fa1 fa 4096 Feb 2 12:41 fa + Samba permission: [fa] comment = Share folder FA path = /home/fa public = no valid users = @fa, aa, bb #@fa= fa1, fa2 write list = @fa, aa, bb force create mode = 0777 create mask = 0777 directory mask = 3777 force directory mode = 3777 User...

I am sure there is a simple way to do the following, but i haven't been able to find it. I am hoping a merciful soul on R-help could point me in the right direction. I am doing a factor analysis on survey data with missing values. to do this, I run: FA1<-factanal(na.omit(DATA), factors = X, rotation = 'oblimin', scores = 'regression') Now that I have my factors and factor scores, I want to add those scores back to my original dataset so I can plot factor scores by demographics. However, when I try to add the scores back to t...

Hi Garrison, I am not a specialist of the code but here is my 2 cents: - I like the idea that in lazy-mode the call (in module or not) is treated by a stub (like every calls). - If the jit is in non-lazy mode, I'm not really fan of the "stub" solution. Is it not possible to use the same mechanism as it already exists : add the function to pending list and emit it after the current

The patch I recently attached to bug 2606, reproduced here, is my first attempt to solve this issue as represented by the attached test cases. To solve the foreign Module GlobalVariable problem, I modified JIT::getOrEmitGlobalVariable(...) to directly attempt to map a found "external" GlobalVariable. To solve the foreign Module Function problem, I modified both JIT.{h,cpp} and

...config intra : range = 10000-99999 idmap config intra : backend = rid idmap config * : range = 1000000-2000000 idmap config * : backend = tdb hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 10.0.4.0/255.255.255.0 [WPKG$] comment = Share di appoggio WPKG path = /smbmnt/disk_fa1/FA1/UsoSpecifico/WPKG valid users = "+INTRA\Domain Admins" "+INTRA\Domain Computers" "+INTRA\domain users" admin users = "+INTRA\Domain Admins" write list = "+INTRA\Domain Admins" acl map full control = No inherit permissions = Yes inherit acl...

Greetings, all: I am using factanal in R. When I enter a matrix or a formula, the print method winds up with something like this: Test of the hypothesis that 6 factors are sufficient. The chi square statistic is 28.1 on 22 degrees of freedom. The p-value is 0.172 But when I enter a covmat, the print method winds up with something like this: The degrees of freedom for the model is 22 and the

...e 200.164.106.140 traceroute to 200.164.106.140 (200.164.106.140), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 192.168.200.1 (192.168.200.1) 0.242 ms 0.147 ms 0.090 ms 2 200.164.225.99 (200.164.225.99) 1.136 ms 1.046 ms 1.061 ms 3 200.164.230.13 (200.164.230.13) 28.184 ms 15.046 ms 50.394 ms 4 Fa1-0-0.VPT-PB-ROTD-01.telemar.net.br (200.164.205.130) 47.771 ms 15.670 ms 54.701 ms 5 200.164.197.133 (200.164.197.133) 54.496 ms 45.505 ms 32.174 ms 6 PO6-0.NBV-PE-ROTN-01.telemar.net.br (200.223.131.13) 57.197 ms 53.778 ms 49.041 ms 7 PO5-0-0.BDEA-BA-ROTB-01.telemar.net.br (200.223....

...61BI.DLL,KMPE61BI.DLL,KMWM61BI.DLL,KMPF61BI.DLL,KMPO61BI.DLL,KMSP61BI.DLL,KMCO61BI.DLL,KMPC61BI.DLL,KMPLSW02.DLL,KMPLSWIP.DLL,KMPLID01.DLL,KMIEDIT.DLL,KCMV3D.INI,CONFIDENTIAL.MIE,NOCOPY.MIE,KMPRPVW.EXE,KMPOPUPMGR.EXE,PMCLIENT2.DLL,KMXL61BI.DLL,KM5E61BI.DLL,KM5C61BI.DLL,KMPS61BI.DLL,KMPD61BI.DLL,KMAGFA1.FDF,KMPRE2.FDF,KM324010.DAT,kmautoc07.INI,kmquery07.XML,KACT2.EXE' Then I connect the driver and the printer: > rpcclient localhost -c 'setdriver Printername "Kyocera FS-C2026MFP+ KX"' On the client I can now remove the printer and add it again, downloading the driver...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking