search for: fa04c38

...7 versions). + return HasAVX2 ? "core-avx2" : "corei7"; + case 28: // Most 45 nm Intel Atom processors case 38: // 45 nm Atom Lincroft case 39: // 32 nm Atom Medfield diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp index fa04c38..d221316 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ void X86Subtarget::AutoDetectSubtargetFeatures() { (Family == 6 && Model == 0x2F) || // Westmere: Westmere-EX (Family == 6 && Model == 0x2A) || // Sand...

Hi Adam, > OK. I know the reason you cannot reproduce it, before posting > the patch I've decided to check for AVX before checking AVX2, > just not to cpuid AVX2 when we don't have AVX1 anyway. I suspect it was also incompetence on my part. Given the differences I'm seeing now I can't believe there'd be *no* difference in my tests if I'd done them properly.

...7 versions). + return HasAVX2 ? "core-avx2" : "corei7"; + case 28: // Most 45 nm Intel Atom processors case 38: // 45 nm Atom Lincroft case 39: // 32 nm Atom Medfield diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp index fa04c38..597fccb 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86Subtarget.cpp @@ -285,7 +285,12 @@ void X86Subtarget::AutoDetectSubtargetFeatures() { (Family == 6 && Model == 0x2F) || // Westmere: Westmere-EX (Family == 6 && Model == 0x2A) || // San...

> That's far more worrying to me than not being able to detect Haswell. > I can't reproduce the problem here at the moment: both debug and > release builds give identical assembly for Host.cpp. OK. I know the reason you cannot reproduce it, before posting the patch I've decided to check for AVX before checking AVX2, just not to cpuid AVX2 when we don't have AVX1 anyway.

I agree with Tim, you need to implement a GetCpuIDAndInfoEx function in Host.cpp and pass the correct value to ecx. Also you need to verify that 7 is a valid leaf because an invalid leaf is defined to return the highest supported leaf on that processor. So if a processor supports say leaf 6 and not leaf 7, then an access leaf 7 will return the data from leaf 6 causing unrelated bits to be