Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "f_4".
Did you mean:
f_
2010 Mar 04
2
which coefficients for a gam(mgcv) model equation?
Dear users,
I am trying to show the equation (including coefficients from the model
estimates) for a gam model but do not understand how to.
Slide 7 from one of the authors presentations (gam-theory.pdf URL:
http://people.bath.ac.uk/sw283/mgcv/) shows a general equation
log{E(yi )} = ?+ ?xi + f (zi ) .
What I would like to do is put my model coefficients and present the
equation used. I am an
2004 Jul 10
1
Exact Maximum Likelihood Package
...^2;
f3 = 4*p*s^3*(1-s) + 4*(1-p)*t^3*(1-t);
f4 = p*s^4 + (1-p)*t^4;
The polynomial f_i represents the probability of seeing i successes.
Suppose we repeat this experiment 1000 times, and u_i is the number of
times we saw i successes.
The likelihood of this event is f_0^u_0*f_1^u_1*f_2^u_2*f_3^u_3*f_4^u_4,
and we seek to find those parameter values for s,t,p which maximize the
likelihood.
My Singular package has as input the 5 polynomials and a data vector u.
For the particular example of u = (3,5,7,11,13). The output are the
following
four roots (p,s,t) and the corresponding Likelihoood value:...
2009 Aug 24
2
Formulas in gam function of mgcv package
Dear R-experts,
I have a question on the formulas used in the gam function of the mgcv
package.
I am trying to understand the relationships between:
y~s(x1)+s(x2)+s(x3)+s(x4)
and
y~s(x1,x2,x3,x4)
Does the latter contain the former? what about the smoothers of all
interaction terms?
I have (tried to) read the manual pages of gam, formula.gam, smooth.terms,
linear.functional.terms but
2009 Aug 24
2
Formulas in gam function of mgcv package
Dear R-experts,
I have a question on the formulas used in the gam function of the mgcv
package.
I am trying to understand the relationships between:
y~s(x1)+s(x2)+s(x3)+s(x4)
and
y~s(x1,x2,x3,x4)
Does the latter contain the former? what about the smoothers of all
interaction terms?
I have (tried to) read the manual pages of gam, formula.gam, smooth.terms,
linear.functional.terms but