Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f9ee224e".
Did you mean:
f9ee02de
2013 Oct 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...on't work, because clang can't self-host on all interesting architectures, e.g. it isn't fully ABI compatible with Visual C++ (yet).
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131027/f9ee224e/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On 27 October 2013 15:25, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Even better! Can we start adopting C++'11 features in LLVM 3.3 then?
>
This could be one of the design guidelines: use any feature supported by
the last LLVM release.
Which could force some distros to compile Clang more than once, but it
could also mean people would migrate faster to more modern compilers.