search for: f9dee0a0

Scott Michel skrev: > No, I wasn't having a management lobotomy moment. If the target's registers have > no subregisters, SubUsed is false and the assert gets tripped. > > Ok, back to the original question: What was the original intent in this code > (lines 186-193 in lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp)? You beat me to it :). A simple bypass (patch attached) does at

No, I wasn't having a management lobotomy moment. If the target's registers have no subregisters, SubUsed is false and the assert gets tripped. Ok, back to the original question: What was the original intent in this code (lines 186-193 in lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp)? -scooter On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Scott Michel <scooter.phd at gmail.com> wrote: > Ugh.

...heck' with x86 and SPU backends. (And fixes the problem > with call.ll-test breaking when the SPU bigframes patch is applied) > > kalle > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100226/f9dee0a0/attachment.html>