Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f9cc868e".
2016 Jun 27
0
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal
...d not the other, I don't think this is a big enough problem that we
> should mess up everyone's workflow.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160627/f9cc868e/attachment.html>
2016 Jun 27
2
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal
On 27 June 2016 at 15:39, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, I probably missed something, but what was the main objection to
> just using submodules? This would put llvm inside clang instead of the
> other way around. When changing an API one currently has to
I don't think the consensus was to change the order of inclusion (llvm
into clang), but to