Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "f96555dc".
2004 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] To a.out or not to a.out
> I'm debating whether llvm should support the "a.out" convention for the
> default name of an executable file if no -o option is given to it. I'm
> currently of the mind that this naming convention is completely outdated
> and not worth propagating in llvmc. llvmc would require a -o option or
> you get an error.
I don't see anything wrong with having the
2004 Aug 20
1
[LLVMdev] To a.out or not to a.out
...cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040820/f96555dc/attachment.sig>
2004 Aug 20
3
[LLVMdev] To a.out or not to a.out
I'm debating whether llvm should support the "a.out" convention for the
default name of an executable file if no -o option is given to it. I'm
currently of the mind that this naming convention is completely outdated
and not worth propagating in llvmc. llvmc would require a -o option or
you get an error.
Your thoughts/ideas?
Reid.
-------------- next part --------------
A