Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f94a0aef".
2004 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] Verifier & abort()
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 18:04, Misha Brukman wrote:
>
> > Perhaps another solution would be to throw an exception with the error
> > message?
>
> Perhaps, but that would violate the programming contract already in
> place. Right now LLVM and its users expect failed verifications to cause
> an abort(). I wouldn't want to
2004 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] Verifier & abort()
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 18:04, Misha Brukman wrote:
> Perhaps another solution would be to throw an exception with the error
> message?
Perhaps, but that would violate the programming contract already in
place. Right now LLVM and its users expect failed verifications to cause
an abort(). I wouldn't want to unleash on LLVM the new semantics of now
handling exceptions in every place the