Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f79494cd".
2014 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
...ppy with always generating unwind tables on ARM regardless?
Just to double check, none of this will change the current behavior on Darwin, right?
-Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140207/f79494cd/attachment.html>
2014 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
On 7 February 2014 00:19, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> This (-fexceptions and -g imply -funwind-tables) seems like it's probably
> the right thing for most targets. With SjLj exceptions, -fexceptions
> probably doesn't need -funwind-tables.
>
Thanks, I think that's the general consensus, yes.
Do we have such logic in Clang at the moment?
My