search for: f6d5f213

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "f6d5f213".

2020 Jun 03
2
[PROPOSAL] Introduce a new LLVM process to resolve contentious decisions
On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > This was a mistake, fixed. > > I missed that this was changed, I was excited about a Discourse category for this! In particular the second point of the doc points at llvm-dev@ being a problem as the current forum for such discussions. > If Discourse is a no-go (?), then having a separate mailing-list would