Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f6597d96".
2015 Dec 11
2
RFC: Extending atomic loads and stores to floating point and vector types
...care?).
In practice, we seem not to care. This is much broader than my
proposal, and I have no opinions on what the right solutions here are.
Philip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151211/f6597d96/attachment.html>
2015 Dec 11
7
RFC: Extending atomic loads and stores to floating point and vector types
Currently, we limit atomic loads and stores to either pointer or integer
types. I would like to propose that we extend this to allow both
floating point and vector types which meet the other requirements.
(i.e. power-of-two multiple of 8 bits, and aligned)
This will enable a couple of follow on changes:
1) Teaching the vectorizer how to vectorize unordered atomic loads and
stores
2)