Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f5698810".
Did you mean:
e569881d
2015 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] alloca not in first bb behaving differently
...LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150405/f5698810/attachment.html>
2015 Apr 05
2
[LLVMdev] alloca not in first bb behaving differently
It's not great IR, but it doesn't look like it should actually crash, just (without SROA) produce comparatively bad code. The alloca is only referenced in the basic block that it exists. If this isn't expected to work, then we should probably improve the documentation of alloca in the language reference.
David
> On 5 Apr 2015, at 04:55, Eric Christopher <echristo at