Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "f496c8a4".
2010 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
On 6 September 2010 01:05, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> DISubprogram CodeGenerator::genDISubprogram(const FunctionDefn * fn,
(...)
> false /* isDefinition */,
(...)
Hi Talin,
The only difference from what I'm doing is that I only export debug
symbols in definitions, not declarations. I may be doing wrong,
though, for multi-file compilation (haven't tested
2010 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...ystemcall.org/
>
> Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100907/f496c8a4/attachment.html>
2010 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote:
> On 5 September 2010 19:32, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've carefully studied the source code of CGDebugInfo in clang as a
> working
> > example. One puzzlement is that there's a discrepancy between what the
> > "source level debugging with LLVM" docs