Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f46d1b42".
2011 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] arithmetical operands signedness
Hi Christophe,
On 05/09/11 18:35, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
> On 5 sept. 2011, at 17:48, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
>> since the result of a multiply doesn't depend on the signedness, I find it
>> strange that your target differentiates between them. What I'm saying is
>> that if you have (say) two i32 numbers a and b and you do a signed multiply:
>>
2011 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] arithmetical operands signedness
On 5 sept. 2011, at 17:48, Duncan Sands wrote:
> since the result of a multiply doesn't depend on the signedness, I find it
> strange that your target differentiates between them. What I'm saying is
> that if you have (say) two i32 numbers a and b and you do a signed multiply:
> c = a *s b
> and an unsigned multiply
> d = a *u b
> then c and d are the same number