search for: f40

Hello, I am using Ubuntu v8.10, WINE v1.0.1, and MyScribe v'?'. I am trying to get MyScribe to work through WINE. The install process works. After install and start, program main window loads fine. Once I try to login it exits. I searched Ubuntu Forms but found no solutions, although I found other people who have had problems. Apparently there is a Linux version of MyScribe, but

Dear R-core, I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. Thanks. [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detai...

...ckported. (CC Luke in case there is more to it) - pd > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Dear R-core, > > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. > Thanks. > > [1] h...

...RStudio last week (v2024.09.0+375), support for Qt builds has been removed. This means that we can no longer maintain RStudio packages in the official Fedora repositories, because the necessary Electron component is missing. RStudio is supported in the official repositories up to v2024.04.2+764 and F40, and has been retired from newer branches. Consequently, I moved maintenance to Fedora Copr, where I have more flexibility. You can find an up-to-date Electron build in the iucar/rstudio Copr repository [1], available for F39 and later, for x86_64 and aarch64. Installation instructions are provide...

...2024.09.0+375), support for > Qt builds has been removed. This means that we can no longer maintain > RStudio packages in the official Fedora repositories, because the necessary > Electron component is missing. RStudio is supported in the official > repositories up to v2024.04.2+764 and F40, and has been retired from newer > branches. > > Consequently, I moved maintenance to Fedora Copr, where I have more > flexibility. You can find an up-to-date Electron build in the iucar/rstudio > Copr repository [1], available for F39 and later, for x86_64 and aarch64. > Installa...

...e in case there is more to it) | | - pd | | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: | > | > Dear R-core, | > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. | > Thanks. | >...

...13345e-07 -1.532306e-05 week4 4.880167e-04 -7.139705e-05 1.360150e-05 -2.548684e-04 Residual Deviance: 143.6754 AIC: 257.6754 -------------- next part -------------- > nose126s2.mu <- multinom(Spoilage ~ F25 + F26 + F27 + F28 + F29 + F30 + F31+ F32 + F33 + F34 + F35+ F36 + F37 + F38 + F39+ F40 + F41 + F42 +F43 + F44 + F45 + F46 + F47 + F48 + F49 + F50 + F51 + F52 + F53 + F54 + F55 + F56 + F57 + F58 + F59 + F60 + F61 + F62 + F63 + F64 + F65 + F66 + F67 + F68 + F69 + F70 + F71 + F72 + F73 + F74 + F75 + F76 + F77 + F78 + F79 + F80 + F81 + F82 + F83 + F84 + F85 + F86 + F87 + F88 + F89 + F90...

...pd > | > | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > | > > | > Dear R-core, > | > > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's > Bugzilla. We > | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no > problem > | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if > | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the > commits > | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39...

...ging > issue, not a nut issue. I suggest you report this to Fedora. I raised it on the fedora users list and then created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267022 and it seems to progress from there. I raised it on Nut-upsuser last as I thought they added this file. It was also in f40 but the two were in /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin and the f42 merge led to this conflict now. > It doesn't make sense to have /usr/bin/rhino in a package. So you are saying that the driver is not part of nut, and it is fedora that included it in the package, but in the wrong way/place. Do I under...

...gration Often there is no symptom of these events before something critical breaks. I'm not siding with anybody here, but there is some glaring mis-information in this thread. -Matt P.s. I do work with a lot of un-pro (claimed) dell equipment, but also hp9000, sun enterprise 10k, old as/400 f40, dec alpha, and yes, pix and netscreen. They all quit at some point! -----Original Message----- From: C F [mailto:shmaltz@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:18 PM To: J. Oquendo; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] How big is *your...

Re problem with libldap.a running Samba 3.x.x.x under AIX 5.1: I have found that Samba 3.0.0 & 3.0.4 & 3.0.10 all fail; with the same error on a p-series 615. I did get 3.0.0 running on a 7025-F40 using : LIBPATH=/usr/local/lib /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf to force aix 5.1 to use the Samba /usr/local/lib/libiconv.a. I had to go back to Samba 2.2.8a (binary downloaded from http://aixpdslib.seas.ucla.edu/packages/samba.html ) to get Samba working o...

Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal at eyal.emu.id.au> writes: > I am upgrading to f42. > > I get this failure doing "dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42" > > 2025-05-17T21:13:37+1000 CRITICAL Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/bin/rhino conflicts between attempted installs of rhino-1.7.14-14.fc42.noarch and nut-2.8.3-1.fc42.x86_64 > > Both packages

> -------------------------from aoTuV_b3_En.txt----------------- > Manuke's patch is used for improvement in the speed of sort > processing > (thank you!). > -------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dungeon/6809/vorbis-optsort-en.html This patch accelerate encoding time about 10%. Why not include in 1.1.2?

> -------------------------from aoTuV_b3_En.txt----------------- > Manuke's patch is used for improvement in the speed of sort > processing > (thank you!). > -------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dungeon/6809/vorbis-optsort-en.html This patch accelerate encoding time about 10%. Why not include in 1.1.2?

...suggest you report this to Fedora. > > I raised it on the fedora users list and then created > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267022 > and it seems to progress from there. Great! > I raised it on Nut-upsuser last as I thought they added this file. > It was also in f40 but the two were in /usr/bin vs /usr/sbin and the f42 merge led to this conflict now. > >> It doesn't make sense to have /usr/bin/rhino in a package. > > So you are saying that the driver is not part of nut, and it is fedora that included it in the package, > but in the wrong...

Hi Folks, I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris 10 280r (SPARC) server. The message I get on panic is this: panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment (offset=423713792 size=1024) This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the scrub seems to have

...xtnsion and is not a . file, otherwise this would be easy... :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: <oss5@hotmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f40.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47344EF3 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:29:06 -0700 Received: from 207.249.157.4...