Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f3f9c8de".
2013 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
> My point is that we can't tell users we support 4.7.x and then expect
> them to just change their compiler if someone adds a c++11 feature that
> is broken on whatever 4.7.x version of gcc they have chosen.
Yes we can. Somewhere there's a line between unsupported features and
buggy compilers. That's not automatically at "whatever 4.7.0 compiles
correctly".
2013 Nov 12
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:32:17PM -0800, Tim Northover wrote:
> > I think that if we are committed to supporting gcc 4.7.x in LLVM, then
> > we need to be prepared to not use c++11 features that may be broken in
> > earlier 4.7.x releases.
>
> We've got precedent for "broken compilers" documentation. Dodgy
> versions of 4.7.x could easily come under that