Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f3e362c3".
Did you mean:
f32363c3
2013 Feb 13
0
[LLVMdev] ManagedStatic and order of destruction
...tLLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130213/f3e362c3/attachment.html>
2013 Feb 09
3
[LLVMdev] ManagedStatic and order of destruction
I'm curious about the design rationale for how ManagedStatic instances are
cleaned up, and I'm hoping someone can shed some light on it.
Currently, ManagedStatic objects are cleaned up when llvm_shutdown()
traverses the global list of initialized objects and calls destroy() on
each. This leads to two questions:
1. An assertion enforces that the objects are deleted in reverse order of