Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "f38".
Did you mean:
138
2024 Apr 30
1
Patches for CVE-2024-27322
Dear R-core,
I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We
updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem
there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if
there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits
that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39.
Thanks.
[1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27322
Best,
--
I?aki ?car
[[alternati...
2024 Apr 30
1
Patches for CVE-2024-27322
...gt; On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Dear R-core,
>
> I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We
> updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem
> there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if
> there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits
> that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39.
> Thanks.
>
> [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27322
>
>...
2024 Apr 30
1
Patches for CVE-2024-27322
...r 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
| >
| > Dear R-core,
| >
| > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We
| > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem
| > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if
| > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits
| > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39.
| > Thanks.
| >
| > [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27322...
2024 Apr 30
1
Patches for CVE-2024-27322
...r at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> | >
> | > Dear R-core,
> | >
> | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's
> Bugzilla. We
> | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no
> problem
> | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if
> | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the
> commits
> | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39.
> | > Thanks.
> | >
> | > [1] https://nvd.nist.go...
2000 Jan 04
0
Stepwise logistic discrimination - II
...881e-05 7.413345e-07 -1.532306e-05
week4 4.880167e-04 -7.139705e-05 1.360150e-05 -2.548684e-04
Residual Deviance: 143.6754
AIC: 257.6754
-------------- next part --------------
> nose126s2.mu <- multinom(Spoilage ~ F25 + F26 + F27 + F28 + F29 + F30 + F31+ F32 + F33 + F34 + F35+ F36 + F37 + F38 + F39+ F40 + F41 + F42 +F43 + F44 + F45 + F46 + F47 + F48 + F49 + F50 + F51 + F52 + F53 + F54 + F55 + F56 + F57 + F58 + F59 + F60 + F61 + F62 + F63 + F64 + F65 + F66 + F67 + F68 + F69 + F70 + F71 + F72 + F73 + F74 + F75 + F76 + F77 + F78 + F79 + F80 + F81 + F82 + F83 + F84 + F85 + F86 + F87 + F88 +...
2023 Jul 23
1
Announce: OpenSSH 9.3p2 released
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:37?AM Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:53?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Damien,
> > >
> > > Could you please clarify which versions are vulnerable?
> >
2002 Aug 17
1
Pxelinux: File not found during boot, HELP
Hi,
I am trying to boot the PXEclient via pxeserver and I am getting an
error "file not found", following are me setup in the /tftpboot:
/tftpboot:
initrd.img
linuz
pxelinux.0
/tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg
default (lower case)
in the default file:
# This is the default pxelinux config file.
LABEL test
KERNEL vmlinuz
APPEND
2008 Oct 23
3
PDA-Logon: mal formed packet
Debian Lenny
Samba 3.2.3
LOOX N560 with Windows Mobile 5
Hello,
?my PDA LOOX N560 could connect via WLAN to SAMBA under Etch.
Meanwhile I upgraded to Debian Lenny and now may PDA cannot connect anymore to
the server. Error 1223 or 1222.
Connecting to XP-Clients via WLAN is okay.
Connecting to Samba Wireshark tells me:
malformed packet:
No. ? ? Time ? ? ? ?Source ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking