search for: f34ce44c

...tly reflect that > Yup. What I had in mind, too. This is why I asked Tobi to create two bugs, and we would fix them accordingly. ;) cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130607/f34ce44c/attachment.html>

Renato, I think we agree. On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 June 2013 15:41, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > We don’t want to encode backend knowledge into the vectorizer (i.e. don’t vectorize type X because the backend does not support it). > > We already do, via the cost table. This case is no

On 7 June 2013 15:41, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote: > We don’t want to encode backend knowledge into the vectorizer (i.e. don’t > vectorize type X because the backend does not support it). > We already do, via the cost table. This case is no different. It might not be the best choice, but it is how the cost table is being built over the last months. The