Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f30cc3b9".
2015 Jan 22
3
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Yeah, the alternative is to do movabs and then test, which is doable but I’m not sure if it’s worth it (surely BT + risk of flags merging penalty has to be better than two ops, one of which is ~9-10 bytes).
Fiona
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My bad on that. So that's what the comment meant.
> That means BT is pretty much
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
...; That may be worth testing the -Os flag.
>
You'll want -Oz here, Os isn't supposed to affect the runtime as much as
this is going to.
-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150122/f30cc3b9/attachment.html>