Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "f2bb".
Did you mean:
f2b
2014 Mar 13
2
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...)
> + return cmpAPInt(Offset1, Offset2);
>
> I think you should put this under if (DL) { /* declare Offset1, Offset2,
> etc. */ }
>
> 0008:
>
> + // TODO: Already checked in cmpOps
>
> Did you mean "cmpOperation"?
>
> - if (!enumerate(F1BB, F2BB) || !compare(F1BB, F2BB))
> + if (!enumerate(F1BB, F2BB) || compare(F1BB, F2BB) != 0)
>
> "compare" still returns "bool". I'm going to assume this was meant to go
> in 0009.
>
> 0009:
>
> Looks fine.
>
> 0010: not reviewing this now.
>
>...
2009 Jun 20
1
how to apply the dummy coding rule in a dataframe with complete factor levels to another dataframe with incomplete factor levels?
Dear R helpers:
Sorry to bother for a basic question about model.matrix.
Basically, I want to apply the dummy coding rule in a dataframe with
complete factor levels to another dataframe with incomplete factor levels.
I used model.matrix, but could not get what I want.
The following is an example.
#Suppose I have two dataframe A and B
2013 Jul 04
1
Configuring pam_smbpass with Solaris
Hello all.
I'm trying to configure pam_smbpass for Samba 3.6.16 on Solaris 10.
However, I'm getting a strange result: instead of sync'ing the password,
it *removes* it. That is not quite what I expect...
I have this line in /etc/pam.conf:
other password required pam_smbpass_csw.so debug use_authtok
try_first_pass nonull
To start the test, I make sure passwords are already
2014 Feb 27
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Nick,
I tried to rework changes as you requested. One of patches (0004 with
extra assertions) has been removed.
> + bool isEquivalentType(Type *Ty1, Type *Ty2) const {
> + return cmpType(Ty1, Ty2) == 0;
> + }
>
> Why do we still need isEquivalentType? Can we nuke this?
Yup. After applying all the patches isEquivalentType will be totally
replaced with cmpType. All
2013 Jan 03
33
Option LABEL
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some
configurations it doesn''t work as expected.
My usual way:
mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ...
One call for some devices.
Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label,
and therefore some other programs