search for: f267ad35

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "f267ad35".

Did you mean: 626bad35
2018 May 11
1
[RFC] MC support for variant scheduling classes.
...at users could do this without learning the tablegen backend. Although if it’s easy to define a new target specific TIIPredicate, that’s fine too. -Andy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180511/f267ad35/attachment.html>
2018 May 11
0
[RFC] MC support for variant scheduling classes.
Thanks Andrew and Renato, One think I didn't mention, and I should probably made it more explicit in my RFC is that: "the new predicate framework is extensible". That means, developers can extend it by adding new Check predicates. As long as they also teach the PredicateExpander how to do the lowering for those new predicates, then everything should be fine. -- In the RFC I
2018 May 10
2
[RFC] MC support for variant scheduling classes.
On 10 May 2018 at 21:58, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > Fantastic writeup! It’s great to see so much progress on fundamental > infrastructure. > > My time for LLVM code review is extremely limited. Can someone work with > Andrea to get these patches in? Hi Andrew, Same here, but this has been a long goal for me, too, so I'll do my best. -- cheers,