search for: f24

On Wednesday 26 November 2008 09:31:26 Wei wrote: > O...k... I try to make some conclusions: > > 1) The conversion from f32 to f24 or i32 to i24 should be written in > the backend. I disagree. This should be handled by the type legalization infrastructure. After all, that's what it is for! However there is currently no support for anything like f32 -> f24. On the other hand, as I mentioned in another email, I thi...

> I disagree. This should be handled by the type legalization > infrastructure. huh... As far as I know, the type legalization is in the SelectionDAG phase, and it is also in the backend. Am I right? or I miss something. > there is currently no support for anything like f32 -> f24 You say "there is currently no support for anything like f32 -> f24", does it means I can not write codes like below? addRegisterClass(MVT::i24, XXXRegisterClass); If the target-indenpendent codegen supports i24, then I can writes codes like above, then does it means LLVM backend co...

...d, I think you could make f32/i32 work for your purposes - given the limited types and memory operations of unextended GLSL. At a minimum, I think that starting with f32/i32 would give you chance to learn and understand more about LLVM. If there are people who are willing to help you add i24/f24 to LLVM's core code base or you have time to learn about LLVM's internals on your own, then adding 24 bit support seems the safer path (if only because it is recommended by people more knowledgeable than myself). Dan On Nov 26, 2008, at 4:38 AM, Wei wrote: >> I disagree. Thi...

Hi folks I use libvirt to programmatically spawn lxc containers I am facing an issue when migrating from fedora23 to fedora24 I use the stock kernel and libvirt version on both deployments, i.e.: f23: libvirt-1.2.18.3-2.fc23.x86_64 - kernel 4.5.7-202.fc23.x86_64 f24: libvirt-1.3.3.1-4.fc24.x86_64 - kernel 4.6.3-300.fc24.x86_64 First off, I need to outline that the host installation is done through some ad hoc procedure, as all this happens in the context of the centrally-managed PlanetLab global infrastructure I could not reproduce this problem on a host th...

...UX have passed the test on both, SeaBIOS and Bare-metal. > > Thanks hpa. > > This means that Fedora would need to (or "should") patch its binutils 2.26 package, at least until a new upstream binutils is released. Considering that a Mass Rebuild was already performed for F24, then an updated, patched binutils would probably generate new, working Syslinux-related packages. Otherwise, these packages for/in F24 will be probably failing. I would guess that Slackware _might_ find itself in some similar circumstances (especially so close to a new stable release). Now,...

> > Considering that a Mass Rebuild was already performed for F24, then an > > updated, patched binutils would probably generate new, working > > Syslinux-related packages. Otherwise, these packages for/in F24 will be > > probably failing. > > > > Binutils: > "Enable -Bsymbolic and -Bsymbolic-functions to PIE" >...

Hi, > I am not sure how legalizer and friends deal with i24 / f24 as legal > types. the type legalizer currently assumes that all legal integer types have a power-of-two number of bits. I don't see any obstacles to making it more general though. First off, i24 would need to be added to the list of simple value types. Then the integer promotion and ex...

O...k... I try to make some conclusions: 1) The conversion from f32 to f24 or i32 to i24 should be written in the backend. Because we should not put any hardware dependent behaviors in the frontend. If we may change our H/W platform to another one which supports f32, i32 natively, we will only need to change the backend codes. For example: The backend approach means tha...

...61<def> = FMUL_D32 %vreg247, %vreg248; AFGR64:%vreg261,%vreg247,%vreg248 4512B ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 16, %SP<imp-def>, %SP<imp-use> 4528B %D6<def> = COPY %vreg243; AFGR64:%vreg243 4544B JAL <ga:@sin>, <regmask %FP %RA %D10 %D11 %D12 %D13 %D14 %D15 %F20 %F21 %F22 %F23 %F24 %F25 %F26 %F27 %F28 %F29 %F30 %F31 %S0 %S1 %S2 %S3 %S4 %S5 %S6 %S7 >, %RA<imp-def,dead>, %D6<imp-use,kill>, %SP<imp-def>, %D0<imp-def> 4560B ADJCALLSTACKUP 16, 0, %SP<imp-def>, %SP<imp-use> 4576B %vreg262<def> = COPY %D0<kill>; AFGR64:%vreg262 45...

On 14.02.2016 18:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >>> Considering that a Mass Rebuild was already performed for F24, then an >>> updated, patched binutils would probably generate new, working >>> Syslinux-related packages. Otherwise, these packages for/in F24 will be >>> probably failing. >>> >> >> Binutils: >> "Enable -Bsymbolic and -Bsymbolic-functi...

Hi, all: Two examples are shown below. I want to use the multiple comparison of Dunnett. It succeeded in upper case "example 1". However, the lower case "example 2" went wrong. In "example 2", the function pmvt return NaN, so I cannot show this simtest result. Is there any solution? (I changed the variable "maxpts" to a large number in front of the

To reduce memory consumption clobbered registers are handled with RegisterMask machine operands which contain a bitset of all registers clobbered. - Matthias > On Jul 29, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Daniel Sanders <daniel.sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > > I believe I've identified the problem with almabench but I haven't found the root cause in the compiler yet. > > The

...OS and Bare-metal. >> >> Thanks hpa. >> >> > > This means that Fedora would need to (or "should") patch its binutils > 2.26 package, at least until a new upstream binutils is released. > > Considering that a Mass Rebuild was already performed for F24, then an > updated, patched binutils would probably generate new, working > Syslinux-related packages. Otherwise, these packages for/in F24 will be > probably failing. > Binutils: "Enable -Bsymbolic and -Bsymbolic-functions to PIE" https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=...

Am 01.12.2016 um 13:37 schrieb Fujisan via samba: > By the way, I can access to the linux shares that are on the freeipa F25 > server from the windows desktop and I do not have the 'ntlm auth' set to > yes this is *exactly* the opposite than your subject, please clarify

...random effect. There are 1825 observations in my data, in which the random effect is called "Date", and there are five levels in "Date", each repeats 365 times. When I tried fit.model1=glmmPQL(y~f1+f2+f3+f4+f5+f6+f7+f8+f9+f10+f11+f12+f13+f14+f15+f16+f17+f18+f19+f20+f21+f22+f23+f24, family=poisson,random=~1|Date,data=mydata,correlation=corCompSymm(value=0.2,form=~1|Date)), the model was fitted well. But because of my particular interest, I need to specify the correlation structure by myself, so I tried the following code, fit.model2=glmmPQL(y~f1+f2+f3+f4+f5+f6+f7+f8+f9+f10+f1...

On February 11, 2016 11:30:02 PM PST, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >... >http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/commit/8750016 > >Booting from DVD/CD... > >ISOLINUX 6.04 ETCD >and then hangs > >ttyS0 debug shows single line: >_malloc(24, 0, 2) @ 0x00104bab = > > >$ ld --version >GNU ld version 2.26.20160125 >... >$ gcc --version >gcc

...ll of the extra keys > working, but that may not have been completely clear from my post. > > Anyway, I figured the problem out myself. I dove into the code for a > bit, and found out it did not have any unused vkeys to assign them to. > > I made an ugly hack and added the F13-F24 range, which gives enough > entries for all of the extra keys on my G11. This seems to work for the > program I want to use them in (wow), so it's fine with me. > > If anyone is interested I'm willing to post the hack I used. > > PleegWat I would really like to know...

...rtition ID: 0x83 > content: filesystem xfs (5261754368 bytes) > label: (none) > GUID: (none) > I thought virt-resize supports expanding xfs <http://libguestfs.org/virt-resize.1.html> so I'm confused here. Is libguestfs in f23 not built with xfs support? How about f24? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/attachments/20160901/a8c518f0/attachment.htm>

On 10/27/2016 04:22 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Milos Blazevic <milos.blazevic at sbb.rs> wrote: >> I've seen the thread(s) you started on CentOS mailing list about Dell and ThinkPad >> laptops and running Centos on 'em. >> >> Not sure if you've seen my question, but I'm considering to purchase a laptop, run EL7 on

..."e22" "e23" "e31" "e32" "e33" [49] "f11" "f12" "f13" "f14" "f21" "f22" [55] "f23" "f24" "g11" "g12" "g13" "g14" [61] "g21" "g22" "g23" "g24" "g31" "g32" [67] "g33" "g41"...