search for: f1c9f589

Hi Logan, There are some tests in the MC/ARM directory that seem suspicious: directive-arch-armv{2,3}.s They expect "armv2" and "armv3" to have an "ARM v4" tag, which is wrong. I know GCC does that, but I don't think we should. Given that this will probably never happen in LLVM, I think we can safely take the correct approach and ignore GCC. Any other reason

Hi Logan, FYI, I spoke with Saleem on IRC, and we agree that this should be pre-v4. We don't expect any issues to come, so we should worry about them if there are any. cheers, --renato On 27 May 2015 at 17:26, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Logan, > > There are some tests in the MC/ARM directory that seem suspicious: > directive-arch-armv{2,3}.s >