search for: f1615f99

Ahh, I must have missed where you voiced that objection earlier. Do you prefer that UDL syntax be explicitly disallowed, or do you only prefer that normal c++ syntax be possible? It is currently possible, I just didn't demonstrate it in the previous message since almost all the feedback i had seen so far seemed to prefer UDL syntax due to the brevity and similarity to Python. I recall you

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:46 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Tentatively final version is up here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587 > > It has a verbal LGTM, but I plan to wait a bit longer just in case anyone > has some additional thoughts. It's a large patch, but if you're > interested, one way you can help