Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f1343013".
Did you mean:
1343,13
2011 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Linking opaque types
...sers/talin/Projects/llvm/tools/llvm-ld/llvm-ld.cpp:582
I'll get you a reproducible test case in the next day or so.
> -Chris
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110727/f1343013/attachment.html>
2011 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] Linking opaque types
On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Talin wrote:
>>
>> If that's true, then it means that we're back to the case where every type has to be fully defined down to the leaf level.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. LLVM is perfectly fine with opaque structs so long as you don't "deference" them, GEP into them, need their size, etc.
>
> Let me try with