Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f1147a74".
Did you mean:
f11477b
2012 May 24
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] -fbounds-checking vs {SAFECode,ASan}
...e's trying to build a tool that prevents
exploitation of code at run-time. A single trap block is the correct
approach for that goal.
-- John T.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120524/f1147a74/attachment.html>
2012 May 24
5
[LLVMdev] -fbounds-checking vs {SAFECode,ASan}
Hi Nuno,
I noticed your commits related to -fbounds-checking and have some
questions.
The functionality of this new phase seems to (partially?) overlap with
AddressSanitizer and SAFECode,
so I am curious how would you compare the two existing tools with the new
one.
Earlier you wrote:
>> So the main idea of this new flag is not for debugging, but rather for
production.
>> This means