Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "f10d5d03".
2006 May 03
0
New jitter.c, bug in speex_jitter_get?
...the speex JB could use a compatible API, then people
could always mix/match these things, and see which one works best for
different situations.
-SteveK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20060503/f10d5d03/attachment.htm
2006 May 03
2
New jitter.c, bug in speex_jitter_get?
On 5/3/06, Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote:
> > I must say I really like the generalized jitter buffer though :) It's a
> > cleaner and more flexible implementation and can more easily be adjusted
> > to contain additional information with each packet.
This looks interesting to tie into asterisk's jb and plc code as well.