Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "f0dc".
Did you mean:
60dc
2006 Feb 09
1
Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 352043 logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Bug reassigned from package `dovecot-common' to `logcheck'.
> retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Changed Bug title.
>
2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
2005 Jul 28
2
Bug#320274: logcheck-database: Please add pop3 to dovecot
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please duplicate the imap-login related lines and change them to filter
out the equivalent messages emitted by pop3-login.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
2005 May 15
1
Bug#191637: New rules for qpopper
...f client [.[:digit:]]+:
Name or service not known \(-2\) \[pop_init.c:1196\]$
If there are any further messages that should be ignored, let us know.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-...
2006 Feb 12
1
Bug#338732: logcheck-database: ignore rule for package cvs
...cvs-pserver\[[0-9]+\]: connect
from [._[:alnum:]-]+ \([0-9.]{7,15}\)$
This'll be included in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-dev...
2006 Mar 29
2
Bug#359878: logcheck: extend exim rules to cope with multiple recipients
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii adduser 3.77 Add and remove
2006 Feb 06
1
Bug#351669: logcheck: [manual] the sudo(1) is missing from EXAMPLES
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
Current manual reads:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks to su(8) or sudo(8), which
change the user ID:
logcheck -o -t Check the logfiles without updating the offset. Print
everything to STDOUT
I believe this shuold be formatted as:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks
2006 Jan 03
1
Bug#344832: (fwd) Re: Bug#344832: correct subject header
----- Forwarded message from General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> -----
X-Original-To: maks at sternwelten.at
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:59:03 +0100
From: General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net>
To: maximilian attems <maks at sternwelten.at>
Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:09:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353868: logcheck-database: no longer ignores "spamd: checking message ..."
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: minor
Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to
1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of
the form
Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286
Could you please edit the second pattern in
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353815: logcheck: Ignore Pocket PC/synce/USB messages, please
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.42
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are some more messages that can be safely ignored:
localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial Driver core
localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for PocketPC PDA
localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c: USB PocketPC PDA driver
2006 Jan 07
2
Bug#346350: logcheck-database: dhcp3-server ignores need to include (none ) client host name
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.39
Severity: normal
I use dhcp3-server and a dhcp client which is Sony HDD video recorder
CoCoon. The client not return client host name.
In this case, dhcpd server assumed the client host name is (none).
Therefor dhcpd output log described below.
> Jan 7 10:49:24 on-o dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:46:33:55:77 ((none)) via eth0
> Jan 7 10:49:25
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
I'm not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS
problem shortly after it was sent.
----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org>
To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org>
Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other