search for: f057327a

On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >> The implementation of the two intrinsics is actually very similar. In this case, the difference would be that llvm.stackmap does not reserve space for patching, while llvm.patchpoint does. > I'm slightly confused by this given that stackmap takes an argument indicating the number of nops to emit

...at or b) believe the "full resume" semantics were a key part of the intrinsic. In either case, we should probably hash it out here. Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131023/f057327a/attachment.html>

On 10/22/13 10:48 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > I'll respond to a few questions below. I'll start a new thread for GC > discussion. Good idea. Thanks. > > On Oct 22, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Philip R <listmail at philipreames.com > <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: > >>> Now with regard to patching. I think llvm.patchpoint is generally