search for: eyerol

...ople normally read text. >> > Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> >> Top-posting. >> >>> What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > We all must make sure our postings are formatted so your circa 1982 /bin/mail command can still read it <eyeroll> Ted, As someone who spends a lot of time digging through the NUT mailing list archives, trying to find the context for previous list discussions, this is actually not such a ridiculous request. I know, we could solve this by moving to some mailing list software that folds previous replies li...

...order in which people normally read text. > > Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > >> Top-posting. > >>> What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? We all must make sure our postings are formatted so your circa 1982 /bin/mail command can still read it <eyeroll> Ted > PL ? > >> >> Ted > > y > tom > > >> >> >> On 11/3/2014 3:25 PM, thomas schorpp wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 13.02.2012 um 18:58 schrieb Arnaud Quette: >>>> 2012/2/6 thomas schorpp <thomas.schorpp...

...bad thing? >> >> Top-posting. >> >>> What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Sorry, can't remember, citation and authentication missing. > > We all must make sure our postings are formatted so your circa 1982 /bin/mail command can still read it <eyeroll> Pardon, but the majority of OSS/Linux kernel devlists suggests not to top post and there're good *mature* reasons why not. As You can read in my headers I'm using Thunderbird and if a "You shouldn't" proposal is "bothering" You, then I hereby apologize for my b...

...gt; Top-posting. >>> >>> What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > Sorry, can't remember, citation and authentication missing. > >> >> We all must make sure our postings are formatted so your circa 1982 >> /bin/mail command can still read it <eyeroll> > > Pardon, but the majority of OSS/Linux kernel devlists suggests not to > top post and there're good *mature* reasons why not. > As You can read in my headers I'm using Thunderbird and if a "You > shouldn't" proposal is "bothering" You, then I h...

Hi Ted, Am 04.11.2014 um 04:12 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: > > Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to > determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack > voltage to the logs as such: > > --- upslog.c.orig 2012-07-31 10:38:58.000000000 -0700 > +++ upslog.c 2014-02-20 09:23:14.000000000 -0800 > @@ -50,6 +50,7

For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.

FYI: PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1328 adds handling of `PRIMARY` alias to `MASTER` on protocol side, hopefully completing the puzzle for issue #840. Reviews and testing would be welcome :) On Sun, Mar 14, 2021, 00:34 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks again for all the suggestions. > > For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out

FYI: PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1328 adds handling of `PRIMARY` alias to `MASTER` on protocol side, hopefully completing the puzzle for issue #840. Reviews and testing would be welcome :) On Sun, Mar 14, 2021, 00:34 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks again for all the suggestions. > > For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out

THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU!!!!!! There was a smaller patch posted to the list for lines -1389,9 +1390,10 a couple years ago, it helped some - BUT - it was still buggy. I have a Compaq R3000, I will get this patch integrated pronto and test Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack