Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "extraoption".
2006 Feb 27
0
method dispatch and in-place modification? - unclass, RemoveClass, getDataPart, method dispatch
I have a little problem about method dispatch and "unnessary" copying.
Basically what I would like to do is:
`[.myclass` <- function(x, i,j, extraopt=TRUE/FALSE, drop=TRUE) {
...do stuff depending on extraopt...
value <- Nextmethod("[", x, i,j, drop=TRUE)
... do more stuff depending on extraopt...
}
I have two general problems:
(1) NextMethod() really
2017 Oct 02
2
[EXT] Should we switch to --hash-style=both by default in LLD ?
Le 2 oct. 2017 à 18:37, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com<mailto:ruiu at google.com>> a écrit :
Changing default to "both" is probably fine, but what does that change actually mean in practice? I believe clang already passes --hash-style=both to the linker by default.
Not exactly.
The current Linux driver (I haven't checked other ELF-based systems) reads this
2017 Oct 02
2
Should we switch to --hash-style=both by default in LLD ?
+1 for both table formats. Then we're compatible by default no matter what.
If somebody cares about .o file size, they can explicitly specify their
--hash-style.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:35 AM, George Rimar via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >> Le 2 oct. 2017 à 14:23, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> a écrit
> :
> >>
> >> I
2014 Jun 28
1
tftp-hpa 5.2
...us xinetd.service?
xinetd.service - Xinetd A Powerful Replacement For Inetd
? ?Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/xinetd.service; enabled)
? ?Active: active (running) since Sat 2014-06-28 12:19:13 EST; 20s ago
? Process: 13379 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/xinetd -stayalive -pidfile /var/run/xinetd.pid $EXTRAOPTIONS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
?Main PID: 13380 (xinetd)
? ?CGroup: /system.slice/xinetd.service
? ? ? ? ? ???13380 /usr/sbin/xinetd -stayalive -pidfile /var/run/xinetd.pid
Jun 28 12:19:13 ws-lapy xinetd[13380]: removing daytime
Jun 28 12:19:13 ws-lapy xinetd[13380]: removing discard
Jun 28 12:19...
2014 Jun 28
1
tftp-hpa 5.2
...Xinetd A Powerful Replacement For Inetd
>> ? ?Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/xinetd.service; enabled)
>> ? ?Active: active (running) since Sat 2014-06-28 12:19:13 EST; 20s
>> ago ? Process: 13379 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/xinetd -stayalive -pidfile
>> /var/run/xinetd.pid $EXTRAOPTIONS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
>> ?Main PID: 13380 (xinetd) ? ?CGroup: /system.slice/xinetd.service
>> ? ? ? ? ? ???13380 /usr/sbin/xinetd -stayalive -pidfile
>> /var/run/xinetd.pid Jun 28 12:19:13 ws-lapy xinetd[13380]: removing
>> daytime Jun 28 12:19:13 ws-lapy xinetd[1...
2010 Jan 18
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-gcc for ARM
...s --disable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-libssp
3. Next: taken newlib-1.17.0 source code and configured with the following options:
--target=arm-none-eabi --eanble-multilib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --dlsable-nls --disable-libssp
4. finally have repeated the step 2, but with an extraoption:
--with-sysroot=/home/LLVM/build/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libc.
What I am supposed to do next? you said that I have to recompile binutils with --with-sysroot option?
Thank you.
--- On Sun, 1/17/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at...
2010 Dec 07
1
[ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.9.99.901
...sion procs and close proc from InputInfoRec.
xfree86: skip a few NULL initialization, calloc does it for us.
xfree86: minor comment fix. HAL ? config backend
xfree86: move a declaration down to the block it is used in.
xfree86: remove some ifdef 0 code.
xfree86: remove extraOptions field from IDevRec.
xfree86: Remove extraOptions parameter from xf86CollectInputOptions.
xfree86: plug minor memory leak.
xfree86: remove IDevRec, replace with InputInfoRec.
xfree86: update comment for xf86DeleteInput
xfree86: remove XI_PRIVATE macro, unused.
xf...