search for: extracted_code_function

Dear Chandler, > Please let me know if you have out-of-tree users of this logic At KernelGen we have an out-of-tree variation of CodeExractor called BranchedCodeExractor [1], which instead of taking a code region into a new function, does it conditionally: ORIGINAL_CODE; ->> if (extracted_code_function(args) != -1) { ORIGINAL_CODE; } I think many hybrid and parallelizing tools need the same logic. For instance, LLVM Polly should be using a very similar code exractor for OpenMP backend. - D. [1] https://hpcforge.org/scm/viewvc.php/trunk/src/frontend/?root=kernelgen 2012/5/2 Chandler Carruth...

...ively impact it... I don't know your use case, so I don't have any specific changes that would likely help you out, but if there are changes you would like to see to the core code extractor in LLVM, feel fere to propose patches... > > ORIGINAL_CODE; > > ->> > > if (extracted_code_function(args) != -1) > { > ORIGINAL_CODE; > } > > I think many hybrid and parallelizing tools need the same logic. For > instance, LLVM Polly should be using a very similar code exractor for > OpenMP backend. > I'll check Polly to make sure it's not directly using these...

Hello folks, Just as a heads up, I chatted with Owen today about a little known bit of LLVM: lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp A toy project of mine has a use for this functionality, and it still seems to mostly work, so I'm going to be spending some time doing cleanup and general maintenance on the code to make it easier and more suitable for consumption by actual optimization passes.