Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "extra_cxxflag".
Did you mean:
extra_cxxflags
2018 Sep 06
2
[RFR] JDK-8156980: Hotspot build doesn't have -std=gnu++98 gcc option
...Martin,
Thanks for your response!
I haven't tested compiling OpenJDK 12-dev with LLVM toolchain, perhaps
the issue had been fixed already, because clang treat invalid argument
'-std=gnu++98' not allowed with 'C' as error. It is better only apply
EXTRA_CFLAGS to C without EXTRA_CXXFLAGS.
Furthermore, I just have interest, did you use clang analyzer, sanitizer
and libfuzzer towards hotspot and jdk native library? Thanks!
在 2018年09月06日 02:10, Martin Buchholz 写道:
> We seem to have some confusion about flags for C vs. flags for C++.
> Most flags for most toolchains apply t...
2018 Sep 06
1
[RFR] JDK-8156980: Hotspot build doesn't have -std=gnu++98 gcc option
...your response!
>
> I haven't tested compiling OpenJDK 12-dev with LLVM toolchain, perhaps the
> issue had been fixed already, because clang treat invalid argument
> '-std=gnu++98' not allowed with 'C' as error. It is better only apply
> EXTRA_CFLAGS to C without EXTRA_CXXFLAGS.
>
> Furthermore, I just have interest, did you use clang analyzer, sanitizer
> and libfuzzer towards hotspot and jdk native library? Thanks!
>
>
> 在 2018年09月06日 02:10, Martin Buchholz 写道:
>
>> We seem to have some confusion about flags for C vs. flags for C++. Most
>...