Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "extif2".
Did you mean:
extif
2007 Jan 19
10
DGD patch not detecting dead gateway
Hello all!
I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel
2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing
well, but when one link is dropped it continues to try it.
At the end of http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt it is said to ping
gateway 1 and gateway 2, for the kernel to know if that route is
working, but since my linux is connected to the links
2004 Mar 24
3
IP Masquerade issues
...;
#
#
# NOTE: If this doesnt EXACTLY fit your configuration, you must
# change the EXTIF or INTIF variables above. For example:
#
# If you are a PPPoE or analog modem user:
#
# EXTIF="ppp0"
#
#
TEQLIF="teql0"
EXTIF="eth0"
EXTIF2="eth1"
EXTIF3="eth3"
INTIF="eth2"
echo " TEQL Interface: $TEQLIF"
echo " External Interface: $EXTIF"
echo " External Interface: $EXTIF2"
echo " External Interface: $EXTIF3"
echo " Internal Interface: $IN...
2004 Jan 10
5
Two routing cache entries with different interface
hi all,
i am setting up a load balancing netwrok with failover,
i have applied julian patch,
but whenever i try to traceroute from any client node, it gives me two entries for that destination, but i get different interface for that entries,
so it doesn''t forward my requests,
i have done masquerading for client nodes,
the ip rule/route are as follows,
ip rule add prio 222 table
2004 Sep 02
6
Slipt 2 ISP strange routing problem
Dear all Lartc,
I try to split my Internet access to my 2 ISP with 1 linux (GNU/Debian
sarge) 3 NIC router,
I want all my users conneted with ISP1 and just some IP connected with ISP2
Here is my configuration:
Internal network: 10.117.71.0/24
Interface eth0
ISP1: IP for my linux box: 1.2.3.4/29
Interface: eth1
Gateway: 1.2.3.5
ISP2: IP for my
2007 Jan 22
5
LoadBalancing on many asimetric different dsl''s.
Hi,
my company have just bought new network and I have question about one problem.
As in topic we must use few completely different dsl''s and balance traffic between them.
2M/0,5M 4Mb/0,5M 8M/0,5M
M=Mb/s
I''ve never done such thing before so I have doubts how it will work. If the links are symmetric 2/2 4/4 8/8 there is no problem because with weights I can compensate the
2006 Jan 16
10
Multi-path routing only using last nexthop in default route.
...erall everything works nearly perfectly. Incomming connections to either
the fios (PPPoE) connection, or cable modem get routed back out correctly.
The problem I''m having is with the default gateway.
${IP} route add default table 221 proto static \
nexthop via ${EXTGW2} dev ${EXTIF2} weight 1\
nexthop via ${EXTGW1} dev ${EXTIF1} weight 5
With this command, connections going out from my network always seem to use
the GW1 route. I if I reverse the order of the nexthop''s to list GW1 first
and GW2 second, then the reverse happens and all outgoign connections...