search for: externet

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "externet".

Did you mean: externed
2001 Aug 23
3
RC2 vs. beta4 (test)
Hi! I would like to share with you an interesting test result. I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1., the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.), with a beta4 (CVS 20010620) and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version, 256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2. The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too, but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs. So,
2001 Jan 17
0
bitrate scaling by freq / quality bug ? / comments
Hi again! I have some other suggestions/modifications. 1. Bitrate scaling by frequency in vorbis_encode_init: bpch=(long)((float)nominal_bitrate/(float)channels*44100.0f/(float)rate); With this modification, if we use -b128 at 22khz files, the OGG file will be 128kbit/s, not 64kbit/s ... 2. Probable quality bug: I tested some floating point constants (recalculated them (see below) and encoded
2000 Dec 25
2
Modification requests / question
Hello! 1. You should modify the 'vorbis_ftoi(f)' for the undefinied OS/compiler in the 'os.h' on this way: old: static int vorbis_ftoi(double f){ return (int)(f+.5); } new: #define vorbis_ftoi(f) ((int)(f+.5f)) Because in some cases we don't use this function, and the compiler writes many error messages. 2. Could you write a frequency and bitrate independent
2001 Feb 01
1
minor psy.c modifications
Hello! Some minor bugfixes... source: psy.c function: _vp_psy_init 1. '-' or '+' in this line? maxoc=toOC((n*.5f - .25f)*rate/n)*(1<<(p->shiftoc+1))+.5f; maxoc=toOC((n*.5f + .25f)*rate/n)*(1<<(p->shiftoc+1))+.5f; 2. I know: sizeof(float *) and sizeof(float) are 4 bytes long, but... old lines: p->noisemedian=_ogg_malloc(n*sizeof(float *));
2000 Nov 29
2
comparison of beta2 and beta3 encoder quality
Hi, I encoded some songs into 350 kbit/s with beta2 and beta3 too, and I don't know why, but it seems the b2 sounds better (makes a better quality ogg file)... The b2 contains more the b3 contains less high sounds. And with the b3, the size of file is smaller with 4-5%... Do you know this problem, or do you think so, that the sound quality is good (or better in the b3) ?? Please be carefull
2001 Oct 12
2
FLOOR_fromdB_LOOKUP
Hello, You know, I always worry about the precision and the float constants... and there is a large lookup table in the floor1.c ... and I figure out a way to keep the code size and speed, but to improve the precision at this lookup table. (the difference is small, but audible) Here is the modifications in the floor1.c: tatic unsigned long FLOOR_fromdB_LOOKUP[256]={
2001 Jan 13
4
Oggenc bug & other
Hello! I would like to send some bugs and bugfix(es): 1. There is an encoding bug in the beta 3 (downloaded exe from the vorbis.com) and in the latest CVS (jan. 10.) too (compiled with MSVC 6.0): If the file contains some non-audible noise at the begin or at the end, the encoder/decoder makes some large clips in the output file, if the bitrate is 350kbit/s . If I use 256kbit/s or
2000 Dec 10
2
Oggenc ideas / source and request
Hello everybody, I've put some functions/modifications into the Ogg Vorbis encoder source. (The new functions are in the first 500 lines of the oggenc.c, some definitions are in the oggenc.h) I hope, you can use it. Here is the full source (same source on 3 locations): http://www.geocities.com/mpxplay/oggenc.zip http://www.tar.hu/mpxplay/oggenc.zip http://www.extra.hu/galileog/oggenc.zip
2000 Dec 11
2
Replay to the 'oggenc ideas/source and request' replays
Dear Developer Team (Monty/Michael Smith/and others), It seems you get angry for me, but I don't understand why. I don't want to dispute with you, but maybe I forgot to say some things... Here they are: 1. My program (clone) is not a finalized, and NOT A RELEASED (public) program. This is just a test, I wrote it to myself, to the (sound quality) comparsion of MP3 and OGG. 2.
2001 May 01
1
encoder observation
Hello! First of all a question: When you make the encoder tables (ie: mode_e.h) do you use the mapping0_forward function? Because you made the encoder tables, and after this you did a minor correction in the final beta4 ... (this correction was: additional[0]=fabs(additional[0]*scale); in the mapping0_forward function) (I see this was a bug, and the modification was correct, but this correction